These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7738499)

  • 21. Searching by rules: pigeons' (Columba livia) landmark-based search according to constant bearing or constant distance.
    Spetch ML; Rust TB; Kamil AC; Jones JE
    J Comp Psychol; 2003 Jun; 117(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 12856782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Age and sex differences in children's spatial search strategies.
    Spetch ML; Parent MB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):807-12. PubMed ID: 17328377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rats (Rattus norvegicus) in a water maze learn both an egocentric trajectory and landmarks.
    Tamara C; Timberlake W; Leffel J
    J Comp Psychol; 2010 Aug; 124(3):302-16. PubMed ID: 20695662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils.
    Collett TS; Cartwright BA; Smith BA
    J Comp Physiol A; 1986 Jun; 158(6):835-51. PubMed ID: 3735168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multiple-landmark piloting in pigeons (Columba livia): landmark configuration as a discriminative cue.
    Sutton JE
    J Comp Psychol; 2002 Dec; 116(4):391-403. PubMed ID: 12539935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do landmarks help or hinder women in route learning?
    Gwinn HM; Fernando S; James S; Wilson JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):713-8. PubMed ID: 12509164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Landmark discrimination learning in the dog: effects of age, an antioxidant fortified food, and cognitive strategy.
    Milgram NW; Head E; Muggenburg B; Holowachuk D; Murphey H; Estrada J; Ikeda-Douglas CJ; Zicker SC; Cotman CW
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2002 Oct; 26(6):679-95. PubMed ID: 12479842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: generality across spatial configurations.
    Sturz BR; Kelly DM; Brown MF
    Anim Cogn; 2010 Mar; 13(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 19777275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Blocking in the spatial domain with arrays of discrete landmarks.
    Biegler R; Morris RG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Jul; 25(3):334-51. PubMed ID: 10423856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A computer touch-screen apparatus for training visual discriminations in rats.
    Markham MR; Butt AE; Dougher MJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Jan; 65(1):173-82. PubMed ID: 8583196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Landmark Distance Impacts the Overshadowing Effect in Spatial Learning Using a Virtual Water Maze Task with Healthy Adults.
    Deery R; Commins S
    Brain Sci; 2023 Sep; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 37759887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The development of landmarks in spatial memory: the role of differential experience.
    Presson CC
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1987 Dec; 44(3):317-34. PubMed ID: 3694120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Overshadowing of geometric cues by a beacon in a spatial navigation task.
    Redhead ES; Hamilton DA; Parker MO; Chan W; Allison C
    Learn Behav; 2013 Jun; 41(2):179-91. PubMed ID: 23180188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Generalisation decrement and not overshadowing by associative competition among pairs of landmarks in a navigation task with humans.
    Sansa J; Aznar-Casanova JA; Rodríguez CA; Chamizo VD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):251-262. PubMed ID: 29516770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of stimulus distance in implicit learning of spatial and nonspatial event sequences.
    Rüsseler J; Münte TF; Rösler F
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):973-87. PubMed ID: 12509205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Occasion setting during a spatial-search task with pigeons.
    Leising KJ; Hall JS; Wolf JE; Ruprecht CM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Apr; 41(2):163-78. PubMed ID: 25734755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Small-scale spatial cognition in pigeons.
    Cheng K; Spetch ML; Kelly DM; Bingman VP
    Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 16481125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Some psychophysics of the pigeon's use of landmarks.
    Cheng K
    J Comp Physiol A; 1988 Apr; 162(6):815-26. PubMed ID: 3397923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of orienting attention in fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning.
    Leclercq V; Seitz AR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):648-60. PubMed ID: 22287208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gender differences in landmark learning for virtual navigation: the role of distance to a goal.
    Chamizo VD; Artigas AA; Sansa J; Banterla F
    Behav Processes; 2011 Sep; 88(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 21736927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.