These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7739493)

  • 1. [Profile modifications induced by orthodontic forces studied by an analysis of the nasolabial angle].
    Chimenti C; Mastromatteo LM; Monaco A; Capogna D
    Minerva Stomatol; 1994 Dec; 43(12):585-90. PubMed ID: 7739493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in the soft tissue profile after extraction orthodontic therapy.
    Darendeliler N; Taner L
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 17367034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Results of a comparative study of skeletal anomaly Class II cases after activator, headgear and combined headgear-activator treatment].
    Papadopoulos MA; Rakosi T
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1990; 34(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 2130044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Results of cephalometric-anthropometric measurements of the nasal profile of patients with ClassII/1 anomalies].
    Sterzik G; Wortha HP; Sterzik M
    Dtsch Stomatol (1990); 1991; 41(5):170-3. PubMed ID: 1816823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vertical changes in high-angle Class II, division 1 patients treated with cervical or occipital pull headgear.
    Burke M; Jacobson A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Dec; 102(6):501-8. PubMed ID: 1456230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treating Class II patients with removable plates and functional orthopedic appliances-the importance of anterior tooth inclination and direction of growth on treatment outcome.
    Hönn M; Schneider C; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Jul; 67(4):272-88. PubMed ID: 16838095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of cervical headgear and edgewise appliances on growing patients.
    Schiavon Gandini MR; Gandini LG; Da Rosa Martins JC; Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):531-8; discussion 538-9. PubMed ID: 11343026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of horizontal growth of the nose.
    Steyn CL; du Preez RJ; Harris AM
    SADJ; 2002 May; 57(5):171-3. PubMed ID: 12174712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of cervical headgear.
    Kapit AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):2. PubMed ID: 15643405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
    Sloss EA; Southard KA; Qian F; Stock SE; Mann KR; Meyer DL; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Author's response to "Effect of cervical headgear".
    Haralabakis NB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 May; 127(5):529. PubMed ID: 15877028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overbite: cephalometric evaluation of the effects of orthodontic treatment.
    Marques LS; Ramos-Jorge ML; Araujo MT; Bolognese AM
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 19146013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sagittal and vertical changes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion according to the Cetlin method.
    Ferro F; Monsurró A; Perillo L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 10935955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
    Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.