These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7741083)

  • 21. Imagery and hypnotizability revisited.
    Kogon MM; Jasiukaitis P; Berardi A; Gupta M; Kosslyn SM; Spiegel D
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Oct; 46(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 9780527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hypnosis and the relationship between trance, suggestion, expectancy and depth: some semantic and conceptual issues.
    Wagstaff GF
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2010 Jul; 53(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 20718242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Placebo versus "standard" hypnosis rationale: attitudes, expectancies, hypnotic responses, and experiences.
    Accardi M; Cleere C; Lynn SJ; Kirsch I
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2013 Oct; 56(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 24665814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A concurrent validity study between the Hypnotic Induction Profile (HIP) and the Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale for Adults (SHCS:A) in an inpatient sample: a brief report.
    Gritzalis N; Oster M; Frischholz EJ
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2009 Oct; 52(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 19862895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility: normative and comparative data.
    Bowers KS
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jan; 41(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 8425774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The relation of self-reports of hypnotic depth in self-hypnosis to hypnotizability and imagery production.
    Kahn SP; Fromm E; Lombard LS; Sossi M
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Oct; 37(4):290-304. PubMed ID: 2793270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A cross-validation of two differing measures of hypnotic depth.
    Pekala RJ; Maurer RL
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2013; 61(1):81-110. PubMed ID: 23153387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reply to Wagstaff: "Hypnosis and the relationship between trance, suggestion, expectancy, and depth: some semantic and conceptual issues".
    Pekala RJ
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2011 Jan; 53(3):207-27. PubMed ID: 21404956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A multivariate approach to the prediction of hypnotic susceptibility.
    Dixon M; Labelle L; Laurence JR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1996 Jul; 44(3):250-64. PubMed ID: 8690536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Personality types and hetero- versus auto-hypnosis.
    Moss BF; Magaro PA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1989 Sep; 57(3):532-8. PubMed ID: 2778637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of prior knowledge of hypnotic items on hypnotic performance and depth.
    Page RA; Handley GW
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1992 Oct; 35(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 1442645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changes in the sense of agency during hypnosis: The Hungarian version of the Sense of Agency Rating Scale (SOARS-HU) and its relationship with phenomenological aspects of consciousness.
    Költő A; Polito V
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():245-254. PubMed ID: 28226290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Italian norms for the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C.
    De Pascalis V; Bellusci A; Russo PM
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2000 Jul; 48(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 10902296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intimate relationships and hypnosis: insecure adult attachment affects emotions and absorption during hypnosis.
    Di Filippo G; Perri RL
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1326170. PubMed ID: 38425553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Phenomenological aspects of hypnotic interactions: the effect of kinship.
    Varga K; Bányai EI; Gősi-Greguss AC; Tauszik K
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2013; 61(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 23957261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Construct Validity of the Dissociative Experiences Scale: II. Its Relationship to Hypnotizability.
    Frischholz EJ; Braun BG; Sachs RG; Schwartz DR; Lewis J; Shaeffer D; Westergaard C; Pasquotto J
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2015; 57(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 25928595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicting animal attachment from hypnotizability, absorption, and dissociation scores.
    Green JP; Green ES
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2010 Jan; 52(3):205-18. PubMed ID: 20187339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hypnotic susceptibility scales: are the mean scores increasing?
    Benham G; Smith N; Nash MR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2002 Jan; 50(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 11778707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Daydreaming, absorption and hypnotizability.
    Hoyt IP; Nadon R; Register PA; Chorny J; Fleeson W; Grigorian EM; Otto L; Kihlstrom JF
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Oct; 37(4):332-42. PubMed ID: 2793273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Construct validity of the Dissociative Experiences Scale: II. Its relationship to hypnotizability.
    Frischholz EJ; Braun BG; Sachs RG; Schwartz DR; Lewis J; Shaeffer D; Westergaard C; Pasquotto J
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1992 Oct; 35(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 1442646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.