These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7741948)

  • 21. Satisfaction with caregivers during labour among low risk women in the Netherlands: the association with planned place of birth and transfer of care during labour.
    Geerts CC; van Dillen J; Klomp T; Lagro-Janssen ALM; de Jonge A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):229. PubMed ID: 28705146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Birth place preferences and women's expectations and experiences regarding duration and pain of labor.
    van Haaren-Ten Haken TM; Hendrix MJ; Nieuwenhuijze MJ; de Vries RG; Nijhuis JG
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Mar; 39(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 28165843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Place of birth and satisfaction with childbirth in Belgium and the Netherlands.
    Christiaens W; Bracke P
    Midwifery; 2009 Apr; 25(2):e11-9. PubMed ID: 17512100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A critical review of the birth plan use in Catalonia.
    Biescas H; Benet M; Pueyo MJ; Rubio A; Pla M; Pérez-Botella M; Escuriet R
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2017 Oct; 13():41-50. PubMed ID: 28844357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Processing birth experiences: A content analysis of women's preferences.
    Sigurðardóttir VL; Gamble J; Guðmundsdóttir B; Sveinsdóttir H; Gottfreðsdóttir H
    Midwifery; 2019 Feb; 69():29-38. PubMed ID: 30396158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improving the quality and content of midwives' discussions with low-risk women about their options for place of birth: Co-production and evaluation of an intervention package.
    Henshall C; Taylor B; Goodwin L; Farre A; Jones ME; Kenyon S
    Midwifery; 2018 Apr; 59():118-126. PubMed ID: 29421641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The lived experience of Jordanian women who received family support during labor.
    Khresheh R; Barclay L
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2010; 35(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 20032760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Childbirth education and birth plans.
    Bailey JM; Crane P; Nugent CE
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Sep; 35(3):497-509, ix. PubMed ID: 18760232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Randomised-controlled trial of two antenatal education programmes.
    Svensson J; Barclay L; Cooke M
    Midwifery; 2009 Apr; 25(2):114-25. PubMed ID: 17459542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do primigravidae and their carers have a realistic expectation of uncomplicated labour and delivery?: a survey of primigravidae in late pregnancy, obstetric staff and medical students.
    Shub A; Williamson K; Saunders L; McCarthy EA
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Feb; 52(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 22221113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of the systematic birth preparation program on childbirth satisfaction.
    Akca A; Corbacioglu Esmer A; Ozyurek ES; Aydin A; Korkmaz N; Gorgen H; Akbayir O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1127-1133. PubMed ID: 28303340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Experiences of women who planned birth in a birth centre compared to alternative planned places of birth. Results of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.
    Hitzert M; Hermus MA; Scheerhagen M; Boesveld IC; Wiegers TA; van den Akker-van Marle ME; van Dommelen P; van der Pal-de Bruin KM; de Graaf JP
    Midwifery; 2016 Sep; 40():70-8. PubMed ID: 27428101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Are birth plans associated with improved maternal or neonatal outcomes?
    Hidalgo-Lopezosa P; Rodríguez-Borrego MA; Muñoz-Villanueva MC
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2013; 38(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 23625102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Changing childbirth: lessons from an Australian survey of 1336 women.
    Brown S; Lumley J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Feb; 105(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 9501778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prevalence, characteristics, and satisfaction of women with a birth plan in The Netherlands.
    Jolles MW; de Vries M; Hollander MH; van Dillen J
    Birth; 2019 Dec; 46(4):686-692. PubMed ID: 31524298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perceptions of risk and risk management among 735 women who opted for a home birth.
    Lindgren HE; Rådestad IJ; Christensson K; Wally-Bystrom K; Hildingsson IM
    Midwifery; 2010 Apr; 26(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 18602202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Maternal request for cesarean section due to fear of birth: can it be changed through crisis-oriented counseling?
    Nerum H; Halvorsen L; Sørlie T; Oian P
    Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 16948722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Communication and decision-making in labour: do birth plans make a difference?
    Brown SJ; Lumley J
    Health Expect; 1998 Nov; 1(2):106-116. PubMed ID: 11281865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Labor and Birth Care Satisfaction Associated With Medical Interventions and Accompaniment During Labor Among Chilean Women.
    Weeks F; Pantoja L; Ortiz J; Foster J; Cavada G; Binfa L
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2017 Mar; 62(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 27543442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.