These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7743117)

  • 1. Nurse participation. Identifying readiness for peer review.
    Recruit Retent Restruct Rep; 1995 Jan; 8(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 7743117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Personnel evaluation to encourage and motivate staff. Peer review--exchange of notes on points of excellence].
    Nakajima R; Sakaguchi M
    Kango; 1994 Mar; 46(3):49-56. PubMed ID: 7807820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The hospital nurse & professional accountability.
    Kelly DN
    Tex Nurs; 1978 Sep; 52(8):11, 18. PubMed ID: 250287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maintaining anonymity in peer evaluation.
    Dickson B
    Superv Nurse; 1979 May; 10(5):21-9. PubMed ID: 254970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three methods of nursing audit.
    Trout F
    Dimens Health Serv; 1974 Sep; 51(9):38-40, 43-4. PubMed ID: 4153529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The clinical practice development model: a framework for the recognition of nursing practice.
    Ladewig NE; Haag BJ; Weber BT
    Aspens Advis Nurse Exec; 1994 Jan; 9(4):5-7. PubMed ID: 8297680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systemic assessment: what it can do for the hospitalized patient.
    Lewis LL
    Med Arts Sci; 1973; 27(3):39-51. PubMed ID: 4786053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nurse participation in medical peer review.
    Orme JY; Lindbeck RS
    Nurs Outlook; 1974 Jan; 22(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 4491913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nursing peer review: monitoring the appropriateness and outcome of nursing care.
    Whittaker A; McCanless L
    J Nurs Qual Assur; 1988 Feb; 2(2):24-31. PubMed ID: 3335590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A development programme for newly qualified staff nurses.
    Dzik-Jurasz D; Jackson C
    Nurs Times; 2001 Apr 5-11; 97(14):36-8. PubMed ID: 11954454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initiation into peer review.
    Hauser MA
    Am J Nurs; 1975 Dec; 75(12):2204-7. PubMed ID: 1041840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review: a model for professional accountability.
    Mullins AC; Colavecchio RE; Tescher BE
    J Nurs Adm; 1979 Dec; 9(12):25-30. PubMed ID: 259635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation gets a poor rating.
    Weisensee M
    Superv Nurse; 1974 Nov; 5(11):54-6, 58-60. PubMed ID: 4612762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Handling clinical incidents.
    Stern DF
    Nurs Manage; 1997 Sep; 28(9):48B-48C, 48G-48H. PubMed ID: 9335841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review in nursing practice.
    ANA Publ; 1983; (NP-67):1-16. PubMed ID: 6559040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review in quality assurance.
    Vengroski SM; Saarmann L
    Am J Nurs; 1978 Dec; 78(12):2094-6. PubMed ID: 251407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Participation in a Department of Health, Education, and Welfare project. Monitoring patient care.
    Freeberg ML
    NLN Publ; 1975; (52-1572):21-3. PubMed ID: 1040841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review.
    Will EA
    N Z Nurs J; 1980 Aug; 73(8):28-30. PubMed ID: 6934445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review: change and growth.
    Boyar D; Avery J
    Nurs Adm Q; 1981; 5(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 6907757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nurse credits contract as way to improve care.
    Stafford M
    Am Nurse; 1982; 14(7):4, 17, 20. PubMed ID: 6921951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.