These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7745046)

  • 1. The value of single versus repeated insemination in intra-uterine donor insemination cycles.
    Khalifa Y; Redgment CJ; Tsirigotis M; Grudzinskas JG; Craft IL
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Jan; 10(1):153-4. PubMed ID: 7745046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Intrauterine and intracervical insemination with frozen donor semen. A comparative study].
    Westergaard LG
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Sep; 153(38):2621-3. PubMed ID: 1949268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical insemination versus intra-uterine insemination of donor sperm for subfertility.
    Besselink DE; Farquhar C; Kremer JA; Marjoribanks J; O'Brien P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Apr; (2):CD000317. PubMed ID: 18425862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting the success of artificial insemination by frozen donor semen.
    Wong AW; Ho PC; Kwan M; Ma HK
    Int J Fertil; 1989; 34(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 2565300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasound in the timing of artificial insemination with frozen donor semen.
    Saaranen M; Suhonen M; Saarikoski S
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1986; 22(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 3536682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Can donor insemination be optimised?].
    Wainer R; Fagnani F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2001 Feb; 29(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 11262856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intrauterine insemination results in couples requiring extended semen transport time.
    Randall GW; Gantt PA
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2007; 52(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 17987885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion used in a donor insemination programme.
    Kahn JA; von Düring V; Sunde A; Molne K
    Hum Reprod; 1992 Jul; 7(6):806-12. PubMed ID: 1500479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Influence of artificial insemination with donor sperm on the pregnancy outcomes and safety of the offspring].
    Liu Y; Liu XY; Wang BS; Wang BS; Xu CS; Li H
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 Mar; 22(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 27172662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The more accurate timing of insemination with regard to ovulation does not create a significant improvement in pregnancy rates in a donor insemination program.
    Brook PF; Barratt CL; Cooke ID
    Fertil Steril; 1994 Feb; 61(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 8299788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single versus double insemination: a retrospective audit of pregnancy rates with two treatment protocols in donor insemination.
    Deary AJ; Seaton JE; Prentice A; Morton NC; Booth AK; Smith SK
    Hum Reprod; 1997 Jul; 12(7):1494-6. PubMed ID: 9262284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Therapeutic donor insemination: fresh versus frozen.
    Barlet EM; Penney LL
    Mo Med; 1994 Feb; 91(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 8183223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intrauterine insemination outperforms intracervical insemination in a randomized, controlled study with frozen, donor semen.
    Patton PE; Burry KA; Thurmond A; Novy MJ; Wolf DP
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Mar; 57(3):559-64. PubMed ID: 1740198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Homologous intra-uterine insemination has no advantage over timed natural intercourse when used in combination with ovulation induction for the treatment of unexplained infertility.
    Zikopoulos K; West CP; Thong PW; Kacser EM; Morrison J; Wu FC
    Hum Reprod; 1993 Apr; 8(4):563-7. PubMed ID: 8501186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of intrauterine versus intracervical insemination in fertile single women.
    Carroll N; Palmer JR
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Apr; 75(4):656-60. PubMed ID: 11287014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A 3 year retrospective review of intrauterine insemination, using cryopreserved donor spermatozoa and cycle monitoring by urinary or serum luteinizing hormone measurements.
    Horne G; Jamaludin A; Critchlow JD; Falconer DA; Newman MC; Oghoetuoma J; Pease EH; Lieberman BA
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Nov; 13(11):3045-8. PubMed ID: 9853853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a cohort study.
    Kop PA; van Wely M; Mol BW; de Melker AA; Janssens PM; Arends B; Curfs MH; Kortman M; Nap A; Rijnders E; Roovers JP; Ruis H; Simons AH; Repping S; van der Veen F; Mochtar MH
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 25637621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective, randomized, cross-over comparison of two methods of artificial insemination by donor on the incidence of conception: intracervical insemination by straw versus cervical cap.
    Flierman PA; Hogerzeil HV; Hemrika DJ
    Hum Reprod; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1945-8. PubMed ID: 9363712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pregnancy rates with fresh versus computer-controlled cryopreserved semen for artificial insemination by donor in a private practice setting.
    DiMarzo SJ; Huang J; Kennedy JF; Villanueva B; Hebert SA; Young PE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jun; 162(6):1483-8; discussion 1488-90. PubMed ID: 2360580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Intrauterine insemination with donor semen. Treatment of involuntary childlessness caused by male infertility].
    Vilsbøll T; Helmsøe-Zinck L; Andersen AN
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Aug; 156(34):4826-9. PubMed ID: 7992417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.