These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7745047)

  • 1. Inter-observer variability at laparoscopic assessment of pelvic adhesions.
    Bowman MC; Li TC; Cooke ID
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Jan; 10(1):155-60. PubMed ID: 7745047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability in scoring laparoscopic diagnosis of pelvic adhesions.
    Corson SL; Batzer FR; Gocial B; Kelly M; Gutmann JN; Maislin G
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Jan; 10(1):161-4. PubMed ID: 7745048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in an in vitro fertilization program.
    Daniell JF; Pittaway DE; Maxson WS
    Fertil Steril; 1983 Jul; 40(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 6222921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Staging of adnexal adhesions: a brief history.
    Hulka JF
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 358():13-21. PubMed ID: 2217488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should lysis of adhesions be performed when in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer are available?
    Oelsner G; Sivan E; Goldenberg M; Carp H; Admon D; Mashiach S
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Dec; 9(12):2339-41. PubMed ID: 7714154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Related factors associated with pelvic adhesion and its influence on fallopian tube recanalization in infertile patients].
    Hou HY; Chen YQ; Chen X; Hu CX; Yang ZH; Chen J; Kong XL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 47(11):823-8. PubMed ID: 23302122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adhesion reformation after laparoscopic adhesiolysis: where, what type, and in whom they are most likely to recur.
    Luciano DE; Roy G; Luciano AA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 18262143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic treatment of extensive pelvic adhesions, including hydrosalpinx.
    Reich H
    J Reprod Med; 1987 Oct; 32(10):736-42. PubMed ID: 2960807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of laparoscopy and hysterosalpingography in infertile patients.
    El-Minawi MF; Abdel-Hadi M; Ibrahim AA; Wahby O
    Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Jan; 51(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 145555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adhesions and pelvic pain: a retrospective study.
    Rapkin AJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jul; 68(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 2941707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adnexal adhesions: a prognostic staging and classification system based on a five-year survey of fertility surgery results at Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
    Hulka JF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Sep; 144(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 6214187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of infertility surgery by a pelvic scoring system.
    Wu CH; Minassian SS
    Int J Fertil; 1989; 34(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 2565307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for infertile patients with pelvic adhesive disease.
    Serour GI; Badraoui MH; el Agizi HM; Hamed AF; Abdel-Aziz F
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Nov; 30(3):249-52. PubMed ID: 2575052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Laparoscopic evaluation of small pelvic adhesions in female patients treated for infertility].
    Grabiec M; Ludwikowski G; Tyloch M; Adamczak R
    Ginekol Pol; 1994 Mar; 65(3):125-8. PubMed ID: 8001846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new tubal classification system for fertility prognosis after laparoscopic salpingostomy for tubal pregnancy.
    Ding Y; Huang W; Jiang H; Zhu J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():136-41. PubMed ID: 27285304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An analysis of the outcome of microsurgical and laparoscopic adhesiolysis for infertility.
    Saravelos HG; Li TC; Cooke ID
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):2887-94. PubMed ID: 8747038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The prognostic value of pre- and postoperative adhesion scores (AS) and chromopertubation scores (CPS) in tubal interventions for sterility. 2. Postoperative rate of conception in relation to pre- and postoperative laparoscopy findings in tubal interventions for sterility].
    Römer T; Lober R; Göretzlehner G; Nikschick S
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1991; 113(8):447-54. PubMed ID: 1831315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient history as a simple predictor of pelvic pathology in subfertile women.
    Forman RG; Robinson JN; Mehta Z; Barlow DH
    Hum Reprod; 1993 Jan; 8(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 8458926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Distal tubal surgery using laparoscopy].
    Eyraud B; Erny R; Vergnet F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1993; 22(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8463574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pathophysiology of pelvic adhesions. Modern trends in preventing infertility.
    Drollette CM; Badawy SZ
    J Reprod Med; 1992 Feb; 37(2):107-21; discussion 121-2. PubMed ID: 1371547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.