These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7745166)

  • 1. Production evaluation techniques based on lactation curves.
    Van Tassell CP; Jones LR; Eicker SW
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 Feb; 78(2):457-65. PubMed ID: 7745166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mortality, culling by sixty days in milk, and production profiles in high- and low-survival Pennsylvania herds.
    Dechow CD; Goodling RC
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Dec; 91(12):4630-9. PubMed ID: 19038939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short communication: best prediction of 305-day lactation yields with regional and seasonal effects.
    Cole JB; Null DJ; De Vries A
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1601-4. PubMed ID: 21338827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Best prediction of yields for long lactations.
    Cole JB; Null DJ; Vanraden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Apr; 92(4):1796-810. PubMed ID: 19307663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
    Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Approaches to estimating daily yield from single milk testing schemes and use of a.m.-p.m. records in test-day model genetic evaluation in dairy cattle.
    Liu Z; Reents R; Reinhardt F; Kuwan K
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Nov; 83(11):2672-82. PubMed ID: 11104288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A method to analyze production responses in dairy herds.
    Ferguson JD; Beede DK; Shaver RD; Polan CE; Huber JT; Chandler PT
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Jul; 83(7):1530-42. PubMed ID: 10908061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of daily milk, fat, and protein production by a random regression test-day model.
    Mayeres P; Stoll J; Bormann J; Reents R; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Jun; 87(6):1925-33. PubMed ID: 15453510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulating individual cow milk yield for milking parlor simulation models.
    Thomas CV; DeLorenzo MA
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 May; 77(5):1285-95. PubMed ID: 8046070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monitoring daily milk yields with a recursive test day repeatability model (Kalman filter).
    Van Bebber J; Reinsch N; Junge W; Kalm E
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Nov; 82(11):2421-9. PubMed ID: 10575609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodology for estimation of days dry effects.
    Kuhn MT; Hutchison JL
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Apr; 88(4):1499-508. PubMed ID: 15778319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of pregnancy on production traits of Canadian Holstein cows.
    Bohmanova J; Jamrozik J; Miglior F
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jun; 92(6):2947-59. PubMed ID: 19448027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical note: detection and adjustment of abnormal test-day yields.
    Wiggans GR; VanRaden PM; Philpot JC
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Aug; 86(8):2721-4. PubMed ID: 12939097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A spreadsheet-based model demonstrating the nonuniform economic effects of varying reproductive performance in Ohio dairy herds.
    Meadows C; Rajala-Schultz PJ; Frazer GS
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Mar; 88(3):1244-54. PubMed ID: 15738258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Yields and persistency of lactation in Friesian and Jersey cows milked once daily.
    Hickson RE; Lopez-Villalobos N; Dalley DE; Clark DA; Holmes CW
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Jun; 89(6):2017-24. PubMed ID: 16702265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phenotypic analysis of pregnancy effect on milk, fat, and protein yields of Canadian Ayrshire, Jersey, Brown Swiss, and Guernsey breeds.
    Loker S; Miglior F; Bohmanova J; Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Mar; 92(3):1300-12. PubMed ID: 19233823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental sensitivity for milk yield in Luxembourg and Tunisian Holsteins by herd management level.
    Hammami H; Rekik B; Bastin C; Soyeurt H; Bormann J; Stoll J; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4604-12. PubMed ID: 19700723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A stochastic model simulating the feeding-health-production complex in a dairy herd.
    Ostergaard S; Sørensen JT; Kristensen AR
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Apr; 83(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 10791788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationships between milk culture results and milk yield in Norwegian dairy cattle.
    Reksen O; Sølverød L; Østerås O
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4670-8. PubMed ID: 17881688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Random herd curves in a test-day model for milk, fat, and protein production of dairy cattle in The Netherlands.
    de Roos AP; Harbers AG; de Jong G
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2693-701. PubMed ID: 15328295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.