These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7745755)

  • 1. Milwaukee deaths reignite critical issues in cervical cancer screening.
    Voelker R
    JAMA; 1995 May 24-31; 273(20):1559-60. PubMed ID: 7745755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative vaginal smears].
    Weintraub D
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Nov; 117(11):921. PubMed ID: 9471658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cervical cancer screening. False negative smears].
    Vassilakos P; De Marval F; Muñoz M
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 9340714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation.
    DeMay RM
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 9111106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Quality of vaginal smear for cervical cancer screening: a concordance study].
    Cendales R; Wiesner C; Murillo RH; Piñeros M; Tovar S; Mejía JC
    Biomedica; 2010; 30(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 20890555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative smears].
    Vassilakos P; de Marval F; Muñoz M
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1998 Jan; 118(1):97. PubMed ID: 9580199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Plea for quality cytological specimens in the screening of cervical cancer].
    Marie G; Barjot P; Crouet H; von Theobald P; Soutif C; Levy G
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jun; 88(6):365-7. PubMed ID: 8351458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [An operative model: verification of the quality of the screening Pap test ].
    Montanari GR; Arnaud S; Berardengo E; Campione D; Cozzani C; Parisio F; Viberti L; Ghiringhello B
    Pathologica; 2001 Oct; 93(5):609-10. PubMed ID: 11725370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer.
    Chamberlain J
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):161-8. PubMed ID: 3570402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid review.
    Faraker CA
    Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 9660635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Significance of sources of error and quality control in cytologic mass screening].
    Zimmer S; Krahnert U; Munck C
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1987; 109(4):209-17. PubMed ID: 3591056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The pitfalls of cervical cancer screening.
    Sedlis A
    Contrib Gynecol Obstet; 1991; 18():103-14. PubMed ID: 1657521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pap smear refined.
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1997 Aug; 11(8):1125. PubMed ID: 9268975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme.
    Tavares SB; de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
    Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 18476988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A normal cervical smear and yet cervical cancer].
    Giard RW; Bosman FT
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1992 Nov; 136(47):2311-4. PubMed ID: 1461300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A reply on cervix cancer screening: cervical cytological test doesn't fulfil the requirements of a good screening test].
    Bistoletti P
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Sep; 97(37):4042. PubMed ID: 11036367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mistakes in cytopathology.
    Shane JJ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Dec; 17(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 9407216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity of primary screening by rapid review: 'to act or not to act on the results, that is the question'.
    Slater DN
    Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 9577733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of cervical cytology.
    McCrory DC; Matchar DB; Bastian L; Datta S; Hasselblad V; Hickey J; Myers E; Nanda K
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 1999 Jan; (5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11925972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How preventable is invasive cervical cancer? A community study of preventable factors.
    Martin PL
    Trans Pac Coast Obstet Gynecol Soc; 1971; 39(0):114-21. PubMed ID: 5164820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.