These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7746867)

  • 1. Nurse fails to follow doctor's orders: jury fails to follow instructions. Case in point: Ward v. St. Mary Med. Center of Gary 645 N.E. 2d 1130--IN (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Apr; 35(11):4. PubMed ID: 7746867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nurse fails to follow "doctor's policy": death results. Case in point: Hartman v. Riverside Methodist Hosp. (577 N.E.2d 112--OH (1989)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):2. PubMed ID: 1722340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Implementing doctor's orders" is no defense. Case in point: Bremner v. Charles 859 P. 2d 1148--OR (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Dec; 34(7):4. PubMed ID: 8303033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Struck off--the midwife who obeyed doctor's orders.
    Rosser J
    Pract Midwife; 1999 Apr; 2(4):4-5. PubMed ID: 10427280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nurses fail to "go over doctor's head": death results. Case in point: Strubhart v. Perry Mem. Hosp. Trus 903 P. 2d 263--OK (a995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Nov; 36(6):4. PubMed ID: 8552757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Liability for failure to spot inconsistency in orders. Case in point: St. Germain v. Pfeifer 637 N.E.2d 848 MA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Sep; 35(4):2. PubMed ID: 7972845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nurse fails to chart call to doctor. Case in point: Morse v. Flint River Comm. Hosp. 450 S.E.2d 253--GA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Jan; 35(8):2. PubMed ID: 7886195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Failure to file suit timely: doctrine of Contra Non Valentem. Case in point: Wimberly v. Schumpert Med. Center 641 So. 2d 1016--LA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Dec; 35(7):4. PubMed ID: 7838973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is there a nurse-patient privilege? Case in point: Roberson by Isaac v. Liu (555 N.E. 2d 999--IL (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Sep; 31(4):2. PubMed ID: 2217817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dr. fails to leave post-op. orders: nurses fail to timely call Dr. Case on point: Lupinacci v. Med. Center of Delaware, 2002 WL 31006263 N.E.2d. -DE (2002).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Sep; 43(4):2. PubMed ID: 12375397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. May you delay implementing Dr.'s orders? Case in point: Koeniguer v. Eckrich (422 N.W. 2d 600--SD (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jul; 29(2):2. PubMed ID: 3406422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgeon not liable for CRNA: no "borrowed servant". Case in point: Harris V. Miller 438 S. E. 2d 731 NC (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Mar; 34(10):2. PubMed ID: 8184088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Asleep on duty" record impacts delay in delivery case. Case in point: St. Paul Medical Center v. Cecil (842 S.W.2d 808--TX [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Mar; 33(10):2. PubMed ID: 8493317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is medical chief's inquiry of nurse subject to peer review privilege? Case in point: Roach v. Springfield Clinic 623 N.E. 2d 246--IL (1992).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jan; 34(8):2. PubMed ID: 8127971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should O.R. nurses know whether standard of care is violated? Case in point: Vogler v. Dominguez 624 N.E. 2d 56--IN (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Feb; 34(9):4. PubMed ID: 8171193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lap pad left in patient: is nurse or doctor responsible? Case in point: Ravi v. Coates 662 So. 2d 218-AL (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jan; 36(8):2. PubMed ID: 8711123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nurses failed to 'advocate' for their patient. Case on point: Rowe v. Sisters of Pallottine Missionary Society, 2001 WL 1585453 s.e.2d -WV.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jan; 42(8):2. PubMed ID: 15301071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is your patient complaining of "pain" or "burning"? Case in point: McLain v. Glenwood Reg. Medical Center (601 S.E. 2d 240--LA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Oct; 33(5):4. PubMed ID: 1454995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mystery nurse reports child's sexually transmitted disease in error. Case in point: Perez v. Bay Area Hospital (829 P. Rptr. 2d 700--OR [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jul; 33(2):4. PubMed ID: 1509091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is R.N. practice of medicine negligence per se? Case in point: Turek v. Elizabeth Com. Health Ctr (488 N.W. 2d 567--NE [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):2. PubMed ID: 1302862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.