BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7746976)

  • 1. Comparison of several goodness-of-fit tests for the kappa statistic based on exact power and coverage probability.
    Basu S; Basu A
    Stat Med; 1995 Feb; 14(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 7746976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A general goodness-of-fit approach for inference procedures concerning the kappa statistic.
    Altaye M; Donner A; Eliasziw M
    Stat Med; 2001 Aug; 20(16):2479-88. PubMed ID: 11512137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance-testing and sample size estimation.
    Donner A; Eliasziw M
    Stat Med; 1992 Aug; 11(11):1511-9. PubMed ID: 1410963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance-testing and sample size estimation.
    Kraemer HC; Bloch DA
    Stat Med; 1994 Apr; 13(8):876-80. PubMed ID: 8047742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A global goodness-of-fit statistic for Cox regression models.
    Parzen M; Lipsitz SR
    Biometrics; 1999 Jun; 55(2):580-4. PubMed ID: 11318217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.
    Nattino G; Pennell ML; Lemeshow S
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):549-560. PubMed ID: 32134502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A test based on the exact probability distribution of the chi 2 statistic--incorporation into the MASC method.
    Müller B; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Ann Hum Genet; 1991 Jan; 55(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 2042937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On a general class of chi-squared goodness-of-fit statistics.
    Kvålseth TO
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Jun; 98(3 Pt 1):967-70. PubMed ID: 15209313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Empirical likelihood-based confidence intervals for the sensitivity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test at a fixed level of specificity.
    Gengsheng Qin ; Davis AE; Jing BY
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):217-31. PubMed ID: 19654172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A chi-square goodness-of-fit test for autoregressive logistic regression models with applications to patient screening.
    Hansen AM; Jeske D; Kirsch W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 24854578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interval estimation of the kappa coefficient with binary classification and an equal marginal probability model.
    Nam JM
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):583-5. PubMed ID: 10877320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A goodness-of-fit test for capture-recapture model Mt under closure.
    Stanley TR; Burnham KP
    Biometrics; 1999 Jun; 55(2):366-75. PubMed ID: 11318189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the goodness of fit in models of sparse medical data: a simulation approach.
    Boyle P; Flowerdew R; Williams A
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997 Jun; 26(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 9222792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing differences in proportions.
    Fisher MJ; Marshall AP; Mitchell M
    Aust Crit Care; 2011 May; 24(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 21536451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
    Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unconditional exact tests for equivalence or noninferiority for paired binary endpoints.
    Hsueh HM; Liu JP; Chen JJ
    Biometrics; 2001 Jun; 57(2):478-83. PubMed ID: 11414572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Goodness-of-fit statistics for age-specific reference intervals.
    Royston P; Wright EM
    Stat Med; 2000 Nov; 19(21):2943-62. PubMed ID: 11042625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of hypertabastic survival model with other unimodal hazard rate functions using a goodness-of-fit test.
    Tahir MR; Tran QX; Nikulin MS
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1936-1945. PubMed ID: 28173610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The sum of standardized residuals: Goodness-of-fit test for binary response models.
    Chen L; Sui Y; Song C; Rempala GA
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(11):1932-1941. PubMed ID: 29579778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.