171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7746976)
1. Comparison of several goodness-of-fit tests for the kappa statistic based on exact power and coverage probability.
Basu S; Basu A
Stat Med; 1995 Feb; 14(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 7746976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A general goodness-of-fit approach for inference procedures concerning the kappa statistic.
Altaye M; Donner A; Eliasziw M
Stat Med; 2001 Aug; 20(16):2479-88. PubMed ID: 11512137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance-testing and sample size estimation.
Donner A; Eliasziw M
Stat Med; 1992 Aug; 11(11):1511-9. PubMed ID: 1410963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance-testing and sample size estimation.
Kraemer HC; Bloch DA
Stat Med; 1994 Apr; 13(8):876-80. PubMed ID: 8047742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A global goodness-of-fit statistic for Cox regression models.
Parzen M; Lipsitz SR
Biometrics; 1999 Jun; 55(2):580-4. PubMed ID: 11318217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.
Nattino G; Pennell ML; Lemeshow S
Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):549-560. PubMed ID: 32134502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A test based on the exact probability distribution of the chi 2 statistic--incorporation into the MASC method.
Müller B; Clerget-Darpoux F
Ann Hum Genet; 1991 Jan; 55(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 2042937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On a general class of chi-squared goodness-of-fit statistics.
Kvålseth TO
Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Jun; 98(3 Pt 1):967-70. PubMed ID: 15209313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Empirical likelihood-based confidence intervals for the sensitivity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test at a fixed level of specificity.
Gengsheng Qin ; Davis AE; Jing BY
Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):217-31. PubMed ID: 19654172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A chi-square goodness-of-fit test for autoregressive logistic regression models with applications to patient screening.
Hansen AM; Jeske D; Kirsch W
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 24854578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interval estimation of the kappa coefficient with binary classification and an equal marginal probability model.
Nam JM
Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):583-5. PubMed ID: 10877320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A goodness-of-fit test for capture-recapture model Mt under closure.
Stanley TR; Burnham KP
Biometrics; 1999 Jun; 55(2):366-75. PubMed ID: 11318189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the goodness of fit in models of sparse medical data: a simulation approach.
Boyle P; Flowerdew R; Williams A
Int J Epidemiol; 1997 Jun; 26(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 9222792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing differences in proportions.
Fisher MJ; Marshall AP; Mitchell M
Aust Crit Care; 2011 May; 24(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 21536451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
Revuelta J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unconditional exact tests for equivalence or noninferiority for paired binary endpoints.
Hsueh HM; Liu JP; Chen JJ
Biometrics; 2001 Jun; 57(2):478-83. PubMed ID: 11414572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Goodness-of-fit statistics for age-specific reference intervals.
Royston P; Wright EM
Stat Med; 2000 Nov; 19(21):2943-62. PubMed ID: 11042625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of hypertabastic survival model with other unimodal hazard rate functions using a goodness-of-fit test.
Tahir MR; Tran QX; Nikulin MS
Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1936-1945. PubMed ID: 28173610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The sum of standardized residuals: Goodness-of-fit test for binary response models.
Chen L; Sui Y; Song C; Rempala GA
Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(11):1932-1941. PubMed ID: 29579778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]