These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7746979)

  • 21. Meta-analytical synthesis of regression coefficients under different categorization scheme of continuous covariates.
    Yoneoka D; Henmi M
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(27):4336-4352. PubMed ID: 28815681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Higher-order likelihood inference in meta-analysis and meta-regression.
    Guolo A
    Stat Med; 2012 Feb; 31(4):313-27. PubMed ID: 22173666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression.
    Higgins JP; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1663-82. PubMed ID: 15160401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Uncertainty of the time of first significance in random effects cumulative meta-analysis.
    Berkey CS; Mosteller F; Lau J; Antman EM
    Control Clin Trials; 1996 Oct; 17(5):357-71. PubMed ID: 8932970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Concealed correlations meta-analysis: A new method for synthesizing standardized regression coefficients.
    Fernández-Castilla B; Aloe AM; Declercq L; Jamshidi L; Onghena P; Natasha Beretvas S; Van den Noortgate W
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):316-331. PubMed ID: 30251007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Random-effects meta-analyses are not always conservative.
    Poole C; Greenland S
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Sep; 150(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 10472946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Median bias reduction in random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression.
    Kyriakou S; Kosmidis I; Sartori N
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1622-1636. PubMed ID: 29717942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Meta-STEPP with random effects.
    Wang XV; Cole B; Bonetti M; Gelber RD
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):312-317. PubMed ID: 29281174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The BCG controversy. A methodological and statistical reappraisal.
    Clemens JD; Chuong JJ; Feinstein AR
    JAMA; 1983 May; 249(17):2362-9. PubMed ID: 6834635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An introduction to meta-analysis within the framework of multilevel modelling using the probability of success of root canal treatment as an illustration.
    Lewsey JD; Gilthorpe MS; Gulabivala K
    Community Dent Health; 2001 Sep; 18(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 11580087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 16463355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Meta-regression with partial information on summary trial or patient characteristics.
    Hemming K; Hutton JL; Maguire MG; Marson AG
    Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1312-24. PubMed ID: 20087842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?
    Cappelleri JC; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH; de Ferranti SD; Aubert M; Chalmers TC; Lau J
    JAMA; 1996 Oct 23-30; 276(16):1332-8. PubMed ID: 8861993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods].
    Twardella D; Bruckner T; Blettner M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15672306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression.
    van Houwelingen HC; Arends LR; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 2002 Feb; 21(4):589-624. PubMed ID: 11836738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Zero-cell corrections in random-effects meta-analyses.
    Weber F; Knapp G; Ickstadt K; Kundt G; Glass Ä
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):913-919. PubMed ID: 32991790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Approximate confidence intervals for moment-based estimators of the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis.
    Jackson D; Bowden J; Baker R
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Dec; 6(4):372-82. PubMed ID: 26287958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A new approach to outliers in meta-analysis.
    Baker R; Jackson D
    Health Care Manag Sci; 2008 Jun; 11(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 18581818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new measure of between-studies heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Crippa A; Khudyakov P; Wang M; Orsini N; Spiegelman D
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(21):3661-75. PubMed ID: 27161124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.