These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7746980)

  • 1. Association models for periodontal disease progression: a comparison of methods for clustered binary data.
    Ten Have TR; Landis JR; Weaver SL
    Stat Med; 1995 Feb; 14(4):413-29. PubMed ID: 7746980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Population-averaged and cluster-specific models for clustered ordinal response data.
    Ten Have TR; Landis JR; Hartzel J
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(23):2573-88. PubMed ID: 8961464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inference for marginal linear models for clustered longitudinal data with potentially informative cluster sizes.
    Wang M; Kong M; Datta S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Aug; 20(4):347-67. PubMed ID: 20223781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deviations from the population-averaged versus cluster-specific relationship for clustered binary data.
    Ten Have TR; Ratcliffe SJ; Reboussin BA; Miller ME
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Feb; 13(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 14746438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simulation study of odds ratio estimation for binary outcomes from cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3415-28. PubMed ID: 17154246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical Bayes estimation of random effects parameters in mixed effects logistic regression models.
    Ten Have TR; Localio AR
    Biometrics; 1999 Dec; 55(4):1022-9. PubMed ID: 11315043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Likelihood methods for binary responses of present components in a cluster.
    Li X; Bandyopadhyay D; Lipsitz S; Sinha D
    Biometrics; 2011 Jun; 67(2):629-35. PubMed ID: 20825395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal analysis of ordinal clustered longitudinal data with informative cluster size.
    Mitani AA; Kaye EK; Nelson KP
    Biometrics; 2019 Sep; 75(3):938-949. PubMed ID: 30859544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association models for periodontal disease progression: a comparison of methods for clustered binary data.
    Ten Have TR; Landis JR; Weaver S
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(11):1227-9. PubMed ID: 8804150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Logistic regression for clustered binary data in proband studies with application to familial aggregation of sleep disorders.
    Tosteson TD; Rosner B; Redline S
    Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1257-65. PubMed ID: 1786318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficiency of regression estimates for clustered data.
    Mancl LA; Leroux BG
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):500-11. PubMed ID: 10766502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating equations for measures of association between repeated binary responses.
    Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):903-12. PubMed ID: 8805760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation Methods for Mixed Logistic Models with Few Clusters.
    McNeish D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(6):790-804. PubMed ID: 27802068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of statistical methods for analysis of clustered binary observations.
    Heo M; Leon AC
    Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(6):911-23. PubMed ID: 15558576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of a mixed effects logistic regression model for binary outcomes with unequal cluster size.
    Heo M; Leon AC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(3):513-26. PubMed ID: 15920895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of subject-specific and population averaged models for count data from cluster-unit intervention trials.
    Young ML; Preisser JS; Qaqish BF; Wolfson M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2007 Apr; 16(2):167-84. PubMed ID: 17484299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of population-averaged and subject-specific approaches for analyzing repeated binary outcomes.
    Hu FB; Goldberg J; Hedeker D; Flay BR; Pentz MA
    Am J Epidemiol; 1998 Apr; 147(7):694-703. PubMed ID: 9554609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximum likelihood estimation of marginal pairwise associations with multiple source predictors.
    O'Brien LM; Fitzmaurice GM; Horton NJ
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(5):860-75. PubMed ID: 17094349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling sparsely clustered data: design-based, model-based, and single-level methods.
    McNeish DM
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Dec; 19(4):552-63. PubMed ID: 25110903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.