These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7748444)
1. Tear and energy properties of three impression materials. Hondrum SO Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 7748444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials. Chai J; Takahashi Y; Lautenschlager EP Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 9728115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components. Hondrum SO J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of prolonged setting time on permanent deformation of elastomeric impression materials. Balkenhol M; Haunschild S; Erbe C; Wöstmann B J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 20416412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the elastic recovery of polyether impression materials. Endo T; Finger WJ Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):355-60. PubMed ID: 16433407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tear strength of five elastomeric impression materials at two setting times and two tearing rates. Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Litaker M J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 18533981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials. Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations. Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wettability of impression materials treated with disinfectants. DeWald JP; Nakajima H; Schniederman E; Okabe T Am J Dent; 1992 Apr; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 1524745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray. Payne JA; Pereira BP Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part I. Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 1774680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical properties of 3 hydrophilic addition silicone and polyether elastomeric impression materials. Lu H; Nguyen B; Powers JM J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 15295324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of conventional and experimental gingival retraction solutions on the tensile strength and inhibition of polymerization of four types of impression materials. Sábio S; Franciscone PA; Mondelli J J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 19089261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of the "thixotropic" property of elastomeric impression materials. Chai J; Pang IC Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 8003196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Final impressions: a review of material properties and description of a current technique. Perakis N; Belser UC; Magne P Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15119881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of strain rate on the behavior of elastomeric impression. Klooster J; Logan GI; Tjan AH J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 1800722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of three-dimensional distortion of two impression materials in the transfer of dental implants. Aguilar ML; Elias A; Vizcarrondo CE; Psoter WJ J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):202-9. PubMed ID: 20362763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]