These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness. Panichuttra R; Jones RM; Goodacre C; Munoz CA; Moore BK Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 1810315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal accuracy of interim restorations fabricated from four interim autopolymerizing resins. Nejatidanesh F; Lotfi HR; Savabi O J Prosthet Dent; 2006 May; 95(5):364-7. PubMed ID: 16679131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity. Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials. Chai J; Takahashi Y; Lautenschlager EP Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 9728115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster. Wise M J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite. de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of temperature on the dimensional stability of poly (vinyl siloxane) impression materials. Chew CL; Chee WW; Donovan TE Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 8148022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new and indirect working die technique for fabricating temporary restorations. Antonelli JR; Torio RS Gen Dent; 1999; 47(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 10687500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models. Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of water temperature on the accuracy of stone casts recovered from addition-reaction elastomeric impression materials. Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 2083027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fine detail reproduction of very high viscosity poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials. Chee WW; Donovan TE Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 2700631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection. Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of successive casts for full-arch fixed prostheses. Dounis KS; Dounis G; Ditmyer MM; Ziebert GJ Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(5):446-9. PubMed ID: 20859561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interaction of gloves and rubber dam with a poly(vinyl siloxane) impression material: a screening test. Kahn RL; Donovan TE; Chee WW Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(4):342-6. PubMed ID: 2638846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions. Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study. Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]