These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7748451)

  • 1. Marginal accuracy of indirect provisional restorations fabricated on poly(vinyl siloxane) models.
    Moulding MB; Loney RW; Ritsco RG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):554-8. PubMed ID: 7748451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal accuracy of provisional restorations fabricated by different techniques.
    Moulding MB; Loney RW; Ritsco RG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 7802916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness.
    Panichuttra R; Jones RM; Goodacre C; Munoz CA; Moore BK
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 1810315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal accuracy of interim restorations fabricated from four interim autopolymerizing resins.
    Nejatidanesh F; Lotfi HR; Savabi O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 May; 95(5):364-7. PubMed ID: 16679131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Composite indirect-direct method for fabricating multiple-unit provisional restorations.
    Dumbrigue HB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 12589294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials.
    Chai J; Takahashi Y; Lautenschlager EP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 9728115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
    Wise M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of temperature on the dimensional stability of poly (vinyl siloxane) impression materials.
    Chew CL; Chee WW; Donovan TE
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 8148022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new and indirect working die technique for fabricating temporary restorations.
    Antonelli JR; Torio RS
    Gen Dent; 1999; 47(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 10687500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of water temperature on the accuracy of stone casts recovered from addition-reaction elastomeric impression materials.
    Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM
    Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 2083027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fine detail reproduction of very high viscosity poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials.
    Chee WW; Donovan TE
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 2700631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of successive casts for full-arch fixed prostheses.
    Dounis KS; Dounis G; Ditmyer MM; Ziebert GJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(5):446-9. PubMed ID: 20859561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interaction of gloves and rubber dam with a poly(vinyl siloxane) impression material: a screening test.
    Kahn RL; Donovan TE; Chee WW
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(4):342-6. PubMed ID: 2638846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.