112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7749171)
1. Some prices of epiphany and the occasional need to stigmatize patients to offset them.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 7749171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Impossible choices: when patients and careproviders face impossible decisions.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 7632993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Physician neutrality and patient autonomy in advance directive decisions.
Peppin JF
Issues Law Med; 1995; 11(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 7635690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Balancing autonomy with paternalism for psychiatric patients? Ambiguities in personal choice and adcance directivesments [sic].
Sass HM
Taiwan Yi Xue Ren Wen Xue Kan; 2001 Oct; 2(1-2):18-28. PubMed ID: 15011652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Deconstructing equity, autonomy, and ethical analysis.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1998; 9(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 9750981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Preventive ethics and alleviating care providers' stress.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(4):283-6. PubMed ID: 7803822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Approaches (and possible contraindications) to enhancing patients' autonomy.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):179-88. PubMed ID: 7841467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The physician's role in completing advance directives: ensuring patients' capacity to make healthcare decisions in advance.
Wenger NS; Halpern J
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(4):320-3. PubMed ID: 7749178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Limitations of the autonomy model for the doctor-patient relationship.
Thomasma DC
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1983; 46(2):2-5. PubMed ID: 6867098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bargaining a will for madmen.
Laor N
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1986; 23(3):183-93. PubMed ID: 3570712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Biological drivenness: a relative indication for paternalism.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1997; 8(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 9436089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Models of the doctor-patient relationship and the ethics committee: Part One.
Thomasma DC
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(1):11-31. PubMed ID: 1342845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The vagaries of patients' and families' discussing advance directives.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 8490216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Impairments and impediments in patients' decision making: reframing the competence question.
Morreim EH
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(4):294-307; discussion 340-1. PubMed ID: 7803824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Who plays what role in decisions about withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment?
Reckling JB
J Clin Ethics; 1997; 8(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 9130107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Autonomy's temporary triumph.
Veatch RM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Oct; 14(5):38-40. PubMed ID: 6500917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Profoundly diminished life. The casualties of coercion.
Morreim EH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 8045768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The three deadly sins of ethics consultation.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 8889884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Seduced by death: doctors, patients, and the Dutch cure.
Hendin H
Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):123-68. PubMed ID: 7960663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Futility in practice.
Schneiderman LJ; Jecker N
Arch Intern Med; 1993 Feb; 153(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 8435023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
