101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7751763)
1. Analysis of condylar position changes: a test of validity of posteroanterior cephalometric and 20-degree lateral cephalometric techniques enhanced by digital subtraction.
Gilbert DB; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Bailey L; Phillips C
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(4):311-21. PubMed ID: 7751763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of condylar position change on digitally subtracted Orthophos P-4 and Sectograph zonogram images.
Ludlow J; Gilbert DB; Tyndall DA; Bailey L
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 9082008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digitally subtracted linear tomograms: three techniques for measuring condylar displacement.
Ludlow JB; Soltmann R; Tyndall D; Grady JJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):614-20. PubMed ID: 1745522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of digital subtraction of transcranial plain films in quantification of positional changes of the mandibular condyle.
Tyndall DA; Phillips C; Malone-Trahey A; Renner J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jun; 71(6):748-55. PubMed ID: 2062527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of quantification of mandibular condyle displacement in digitally subtracted linear tomograms.
Ludlow JB; Soltmann R; Tyndall D; Grady JJ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 1397462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A method for quantifying positional change of the condyle on lateral tomograms by means of digital subtraction.
Sato H; Ohki M; Kitamori H
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Jun; 25(6):448-55. PubMed ID: 9687118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
Goyal MK; Goyal S
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of digital subtraction radiography for assessment of changes in position of the mandibular condyle.
Ekberg EC; Petersson A; Nilner M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 9780901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of condylar position from temporomandibular joint radiographs.
Aquilino SA; Matteson SR; Holland GA; Phillips C
J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Jan; 53(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 3856026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.
Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on spiral computed tomography-derived three-dimensional images and its comparison with digital cephalometric radiography.
Varghese S; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S; Vikraman B; Chithranjan A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 May; 39(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 20395462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positional changes of the mandibular condyle assessed by three-dimensional computed tomography.
Tyndall DA; Renner JB; Phillips C; Matteson SR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Nov; 50(11):1164-72. PubMed ID: 1403271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptibility of condylar displacement through transcranial radiographs and split-cast technique on dry skull.
Lombardi M; Preti G; Tomasinelli A; Debernardi C
Cranio; 1991 Jan; 9(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 1843475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative study of the movements between condyle and exterior point in lateral movement].
Izumi Y
Ou Daigaku Shigakushi; 1990 Nov; 17(3):308-21. PubMed ID: 2132324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital subtraction temporomandibular joint tomography.
Prapanpoch S; Langlais RP; Dove SB; Prihoda TJ; McDavid WD; Nummikoski PV; Preece JW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Jan; 75(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 8419866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing condylar changes with digital subtraction radiography.
Kapa SF; Tyndall DA; Zullo TG; Bagnell CR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Feb; 75(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 8426725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Landmark identification error in submentovertex cephalometrics. A computerized method for determining the condylar long axis.
Williamson PC; Major PW; Nebbe B; Glover KE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Sep; 86(3):360-9. PubMed ID: 9768429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of positioning variations in transcranial radiographs of the temporomandibular joint: a laboratory study.
Gray RJ; Quayle AA; Horner K; Al-Gorashi AJ
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1991 Aug; 29(4):241-9. PubMed ID: 1911672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Research of condylar movement on nonworking side during quantitative lateral movement of mandible].
Tanaka S
Ou Daigaku Shigakushi; 1990 Nov; 17(3):289-302. PubMed ID: 2132323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporomandibular articulation tomography: a corrected anteroposterior and lateral cephalometric technique.
Rosenberg HM; Graczyk RJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Aug; 62(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 3462617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
