91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7753019)
1. [The objective comparison of nuclear DNA content with nuclear grade in breast cancer].
Yamamoto N
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Apr; 96(4):236-44. PubMed ID: 7753019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Assay of DNA content and estrogen receptor status in human breast cancer].
Chen GJ; Shao YF; Shan Y
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 1994 Nov; 16(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 7720507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of proliferation activity in breast carcinoma by flow cytometry analysis of S-phase and quantitative analysis of MIB-1.
Masood S; Bui MM; Lu L
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1998; 28(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 9846198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlations of morphology, proliferation indices, and oncogene activation in ductal breast carcinoma: nuclear grade, S-phase, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, p53, epidermal growth factor receptor, and c-erb-B-2.
Dabbs DJ
Mod Pathol; 1995 Aug; 8(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 8532697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between Ki-67 index and S-phase fraction on fine-needle aspiration samples from breast carcinoma.
Bozzetti C; Nizzoli R; Camisa R; Guazzi A; Ceci G; Cocconi G; Mazzini G; Naldi N
Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):287-92. PubMed ID: 9349516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of flow and image cytometry for DNA content analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in breast carcinoma.
Chen TL; Luo I; Mikhail N; Rasková J; Raska K
Cytometry; 1995 Sep; 22(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 8556949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flow cytometry vs. Ki67 labelling index in breast cancer: a prospective evaluation of 181 cases.
Martínez-Arribas F; Núñez MJ; Piqueras V; Lucas AR; Sánchez J; Tejerina A; Schneider J
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(1A):295-8. PubMed ID: 12017306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Objective evaluation of nuclear grade in preoperative aspiration materials from breast cancers--special reference to the relationship of coefficiency variant of nuclear area with pathological prognostic features].
Miyauchi M
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Nov; 92(11):1642-9. PubMed ID: 1770937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mutant p53 expression and DNA analysis in human breast cancer comparison with conventional clinicopathological parameters.
Rosanelli GP; Steindorfer P; Wirnsberger GH; Klimpfinger M; Ratschek M; Puerstner P; Auner H; Berhold A
Anticancer Res; 1995; 15(2):581-6. PubMed ID: 7763041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biological indicators of aggressiveness in T1 ductal invasive breast cancer.
Bucci B; Carico E; Rinaldi A; Froio F; Puce YM; D'Agnano I; Vecchione A; Brunetti E
Anticancer Res; 2001; 21(4B):2949-55. PubMed ID: 11712792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Correlation of DNA index and S-phase fraction with histopathologic grade and clinical outcome.
Demirel D; Laucirica R; Fishman A; Owens RG; Grey MM; Kaplan AL; Ramzy I
Cancer; 1996 Apr; 77(8):1494-500. PubMed ID: 8608534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Combined flow cytometry determination of S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy is an independent prognostic factor in node-negative invasive breast carcinoma: review of a series of 271 patients with stage I and II breast cancer].
Moureau-Zabotto L; Bouchet C; Cesari D; Uzan S; Lefranc JP; Antoine M; Genestie C; Deniaud-Alexandre E; Bernaudin JF; Touboul E; Fleury-Feith J
Cancer Radiother; 2005 Dec; 9(8):575-86. PubMed ID: 16243560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Carcinoma in situ of the female breast. A clinico-pathological, immunohistological, and DNA ploidy study.
Ottesen GL
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (108):1-67. PubMed ID: 12874968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of the malignancy in gallbladder cancer assessed by nuclear DNA contents and mitotic indices--with special reference to the prognosis of the patients with cancer involvement to the subserosal layer].
Sato Y; Tanaka J; Yoshioka H; Koyama K
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Jan; 92(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 2014025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nuclear grading and flow cytometric DNA pattern in fine-needle aspirates of primary breast cancer.
Bozzetti C; Nizzoli R; Naldi N; Guazzi A; Camisa R; Manotti L; Pilato FP; Mazzini G; Cocconi G
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Aug; 15(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 8872432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [DNA analysis by flow cytometry in breast carcinoma].
Tsuchiya A; Sekikawa K; Sato H; Ando Y; Suzuki S; Nihei M; Rokkaku Y; Nomizu T; Kimijima I; Abe R
Gan No Rinsho; 1989 Jan; 35(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 2921806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Relationship between DNA ploidy and survival in breast cancer].
Utada Y; Yoshimoto M; Kasumi F; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Apr; 25 Suppl 3():431-5. PubMed ID: 9589048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flow cytometry in primary breast carcinomas: prognostic impact of S-phase fraction according to different analysis patterns.
Michels JJ; Marnay J; Plancoulaine B; Chasle J
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2004 May; 59(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 15108168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DNA analysis and S-phase fraction determination by flow cytometric analysis of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast.
Frost AR; Karcher DS; Terahata S; Siegel RS; Silverberg SG
Mod Pathol; 1996 Sep; 9(9):930-7. PubMed ID: 8878026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinical relevance of ploidy and S-phase fraction determination in salivary gland tumors: a flow cytometric study of 97 cases.
Pinto AE; Fonseca I; Soares J
Cancer; 1999 Jan; 85(2):273-81. PubMed ID: 10023692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
