These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7754082)

  • 1. The role of preparation in overlapping-task performance.
    De Jong R
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Feb; 48(1):2-25. PubMed ID: 7754082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Rumiati RI
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):448-58. PubMed ID: 16215746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance.
    De Jong R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Oct; 19(5):965-80. PubMed ID: 8228846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies.
    Miller J
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):484-93. PubMed ID: 16237555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment.
    Maquestiaux F; Laguë-Beauvais M; Ruthruff E; Bherer L
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1262-82. PubMed ID: 18927042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.
    Schumacher EH; Schwarb H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):270-90. PubMed ID: 19397384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference?
    Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 8189196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task switching and action sequencing.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):526-40. PubMed ID: 16328435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?
    Ruthruff E; Hazeltine E; Remington RW
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):494-503. PubMed ID: 16184395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The dual-task SRT procedure: fine-tuning the timing.
    Hsiao AT; Reber AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 11495123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sequential task predictability in task switching.
    Koch I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 15945203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A neuropsychological assessment of dual-task costs in closed-head injury patients using Cohen's effect size estimation method.
    Dell'Acqua R; Sessa P; Pashler H
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):553-61. PubMed ID: 16142490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are processing limitations of visual attention and response selection subject to the same bottleneck in dual-tasks?
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Frensch PA; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1052-69. PubMed ID: 25810162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modality pairing effects and the response selection bottleneck.
    Hazeltine E; Ruthruff E
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 16151721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks.
    Hoffmann J; Sebald A; Stöcker C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):470-82. PubMed ID: 11294444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The preparation effect in task switching: carryover of SOA.
    Altmann EM
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):153-63. PubMed ID: 15078052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determinants of central processing order in psychological refractory period paradigms: central arrival times, detection times, or preparation?
    Leonhard T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):2012-43. PubMed ID: 21678229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aging and input processing in dual-task situations.
    Hein G; Schubert T
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Sep; 19(3):416-32. PubMed ID: 15382993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is advance reconfiguration in voluntary task switching affected by the design employed?
    Liefooghe B; Demanet J; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):850-7. PubMed ID: 19132632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task-set control: evidence for reduction of task competition.
    Hübner M; Dreisbach G; Haider H; Kluwe RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Mar; 29(2):289-97. PubMed ID: 12696816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.