These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7754082)

  • 21. Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention?
    Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):826-42. PubMed ID: 2148595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Serial or overlapping processing in multitasking as individual preference: Effects of stimulus preview on task switching and concurrent dual-task performance.
    Reissland J; Manzey D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jul; 168():27-40. PubMed ID: 27155317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Secondary-task effects on sequence learning.
    Heuer H; Schmidtke V
    Psychol Res; 1996; 59(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 8810586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attentional awakening: gradual modulation of temporal attention in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Ariga A; Yokosawa K
    Psychol Res; 2008 Mar; 72(2):192-202. PubMed ID: 17106706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: switching tasks in sequences.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):623-40. PubMed ID: 17087577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck.
    Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Jun; 10(3):358-77. PubMed ID: 6242412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.
    Stelzel C; Schumacher EH; Schubert T; D'Esposito M
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):514-25. PubMed ID: 16175414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Virtually no evidence for virtually perfect time-sharing.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):795-810. PubMed ID: 15462621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift-diffusion model approach.
    Mattes A; Tavera F; Ophey A; Roheger M; Gaschler R; Haider H
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1529-1552. PubMed ID: 32335762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electrophysiological evidence of central interference in the control of visuospatial attention.
    Brisson B; Jolicoeur P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17546742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect?
    Maquestiaux F; Hartley AA; Bertsch J
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Dec; 19(4):649-67. PubMed ID: 15584790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Emergent perceptual features in the benefit of consistent stimulus-response mappings on dual-task performance.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):468-83. PubMed ID: 16215745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Task predictability influences the variable foreperiod effect: evidence of task-specific temporal preparation.
    Schröter H; Birngruber T; Bratzke D; Miller J; Ulrich R
    Psychol Res; 2015 Mar; 79(2):230-7. PubMed ID: 24659170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of recent practice on task switching.
    Yeung N; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):919-36. PubMed ID: 14585014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Overlapping mental operations in serial performance with preview.
    Pashler H
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1994 Feb; 47(1):161-91; discussion 193-9, 201-5. PubMed ID: 8177960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attentional switching in the sequential flanker task: age, location, and time course effects.
    Li KZ; Dupuis K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):416-27. PubMed ID: 17869202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A paradigm for exploring what the mind does while deciding what it should do.
    Besner D; Care S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2003 Dec; 57(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 14710868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Processing two tasks with varying task order: central stage duration influences central processing order.
    Ruiz Fernández S; Leonhard T; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 21427007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Miller J; Alderton M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 16478333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.