These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7754082)

  • 41. Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval.
    Rohrer D; Pashler HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 12747495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Asymmetrical learning between a tactile and visual serial RT task.
    Abrahamse EL; van der Lubbe RH; Verwey WB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 17896207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Revisiting within-modality and cross-modality attentional blinks: effects of target-distractor similarity.
    Arnell KM; Jenkins R
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Oct; 66(7):1147-61. PubMed ID: 15751472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Probing the response selection bottleneck with a cardiac measure: individual differences in strategy for a psychological refractory period task.
    Jennings JR; van der Molen MW; Debski KB
    Biol Psychol; 2002 May; 59(3):207-30. PubMed ID: 12009562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Current task activation predicts general effects of advance preparation in task switching.
    Poljac E; de Haan A; van Galen GP
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 17176657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Higher-order cognitive control in dual tasks: Evidence from task-pair switching.
    Hirsch P; Nolden S; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):569-580. PubMed ID: 28080113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Defining task-set reconfiguration: the case of reference point switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 17546741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Does size rescaling require central attention?
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 11901957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal divided attention.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):160-9. PubMed ID: 1826309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Learning to bypass the central bottleneck: declining automaticity with advancing age.
    Maquestiaux F; Laguë-Beauvais M; Ruthruff E; Hartley A; Bherer L
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Mar; 25(1):177-92. PubMed ID: 20230138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Processing order in dual-task situations: The "first-come, first-served" principle and the impact of task order instructions.
    Strobach T; Hendrich E; Kübler S; Müller H; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1785-1803. PubMed ID: 29978280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Absence of perceptual processing during reconfiguration of task set.
    Oriet C; Jolcoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1036-49. PubMed ID: 14585021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Flexibility of individual multitasking strategies in task-switching with preview: are preferences for serial versus overlapping task processing dependent on between-task conflict?
    Brüning J; Manzey D
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):92-108. PubMed ID: 28983726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Two forms of sequential implicit learning.
    Seger CA
    Conscious Cogn; 1997 Mar; 6(1):108-31. PubMed ID: 9170564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A critical test of the failure-to-engage theory of task switching.
    Brown S; Lehmann C; Poboka D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):152-9. PubMed ID: 16724783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Nonintentional task set activation: evidence from implicit task sequence learning.
    Gotler A; Meiran N; Tzelgov J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):890-6. PubMed ID: 15000536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cross-modal attentional deficits in processing tactile stimulation.
    Dell'Acqua R; Turatto M; Jolicoeur P
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):777-89. PubMed ID: 11521846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Visual memory for pictorial stimuli in a serial choice reaction-time task.
    Marshall E; Walker P
    Br J Psychol; 1987 May; 78 ( Pt 2)():213-31. PubMed ID: 3594091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.