These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7754127)

  • 1. [Development and use of quality control program in magnetic resonance].
    Berardi P; Bergamini C; Gavelli G; Lembo C; Pavlica P; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C
    Radiol Med; 1995 Mar; 89(3):310-8. PubMed ID: 7754127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Definition criteria for a magnetic resonance quality assurance program: multicenter study].
    Mascaro L; Strocchi S; Colombo P; Del Corona M; Baldassarri AM
    Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):389-97. PubMed ID: 10432972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multicenter trial for the set-up of a MRI quality assurance programme.
    Colombo P; Baldassarri A; Del Corona M; Mascaro L; Strocchi S
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jan; 22(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 14972398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic quality control devices.
    Health Devices; 2000 Apr; 29(4):97-139. PubMed ID: 11002439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.
    Novis DA; Jones BA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 9625416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Applications of the quality control program in diagnostic radiology. Confirmation of results, clinical and managerial benefits].
    Bergamini C; Berardi P; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Pavlica P
    Radiol Med; 1994 Mar; 87(3):308-11. PubMed ID: 8146371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quality control in magnetic resonance for clinical use].
    Podo F
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1994; 30(1):123-37. PubMed ID: 7832394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T for clinical patients.
    Onishi H; Kim T; Hori M; Murakami T; Tatsumi M; Nakaya Y; Nakamoto A; Osuga K; Tomoda K; Nakamura H
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):559-65. PubMed ID: 19692840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance for MRI: practical experience.
    Firbank MJ; Harrison RM; Williams ED; Coulthard A
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Apr; 73(868):376-83. PubMed ID: 10844863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiac MRI: comparison between single-shot fast spin echo and conventional spin echo sequences in the morphological evaluation of the ventricles.
    Erriquez D; Di Cesare E; Barile A; Gallucci M; Splendiani A; Masciocchi C
    Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):34-44. PubMed ID: 11859299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing the quality of images for permanent magnet desktop MRI systems using specially designed phantoms.
    Qiu J; Wang G; Min J; Wang X; Wang P
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 58(24):8677-87. PubMed ID: 24263463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Motion related artifacts in spin-echo MR imaging: effects of sequence parameters on image quality at 1.5 Tesla.
    Adjei ON; Sugimura H; Tamura S; Shimizu T; Kihara Y; Kakitsubata S; Kakitsubata Y; Watanabe K
    Radiat Med; 1996; 14(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 8916259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2D single-shot fast spin-echo and 3D fast spin-echo sequences.
    Cova M; Stacul F; Cester G; Ukmar M; Pozzi Mucelli R
    Radiol Med; 2003 Sep; 106(3):178-90. PubMed ID: 14612839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MRS quality assessment in a multicentre study on MRS-based classification of brain tumours.
    van der Graaf M; Julià-Sapé M; Howe FA; Ziegler A; Majós C; Moreno-Torres A; Rijpkema M; Acosta D; Opstad KS; van der Meulen YM; Arús C; Heerschap A
    NMR Biomed; 2008 Feb; 21(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 17458918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A two-compartment gel phantom for optimization and quality assurance in clinical BOLD fMRI.
    Olsrud J; Nilsson A; Mannfolk P; Waites A; Ståhlberg F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Feb; 26(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 17728091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A dual modality approach to quantitative quality control in emission tomography.
    Thomas MD; Bailey DL; Livieratos L
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):N187-94. PubMed ID: 16030376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assurance of clinical MRI scanners using ACR MRI phantom: preliminary results.
    Chen CC; Wan YL; Wai YY; Liu HL
    J Digit Imaging; 2004 Dec; 17(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 15692871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality control protocol for in vitro micro-computed tomography.
    Stoico R; Tassani S; Perilli E; Baruffaldi F; Viceconti M
    J Microsc; 2010 May; 238(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 20529063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Results of the quality control of magnetic resonance images].
    Duina A; Mascaro L; Moretti R; Belletti S
    Radiol Med; 1992 Mar; 83(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 1579680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.