BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7754128)

  • 1. [Dosimetric evaluations in dental radiology: comparison of the digital system and the conventional system].
    Blanc M; Nessi R; Paruccini N; Castellana L
    Radiol Med; 1995 Mar; 89(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 7754128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation dose in dental radiology.
    Cohnen M; Kemper J; Möbes O; Pawelzik J; Mödder U
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Mar; 12(3):634-7. PubMed ID: 11870479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective doses in intraoral and panoramic dental radiology from dose-area product values.
    Looe HK; Eenboom F; Chofor N; Pfaffenberger A; Steinhoff M; Rühmann A; Poplawski A; Willborn K; Poppe B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 18550517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Absorbed doses for patients undergoing panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography and CBCT.
    Wrzesień M; Olszewski J
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Jul; 30(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 28584324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation exposure to critical organs in panoramic dental examination.
    Bahreyni Toossi MT; Akbari F; Bayani Roodi S
    Acta Med Iran; 2012; 50(12):809-13. PubMed ID: 23456522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduction of absorbed doses in radiography of the facial skeleton.
    Julin P; Kraepelien T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Nov; 143(5):1113-6. PubMed ID: 6333160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of dose-area product from panoramic radiography using a pencil ionization chamber: normalized data for the estimation of patient effective and organ doses.
    Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Neratzoulakis J; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):708-14. PubMed ID: 15124987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uroradiographic dosimetry using a rare-earth screen-film system.
    Segal AJ; Maillie HD; Lemkin JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Nov; 139(5):923-6. PubMed ID: 6981976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography].
    Visser H; Hermann KP; Bredemeier S; Köhler B
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Jul; 4(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 10994319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation dose to the lens of eye and thyroid gland in paranasal sinus multislice CT.
    Zammit-Maempel I; Chadwick CL; Willis SP
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jun; 76(906):418-20. PubMed ID: 12814929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Establishment of diagnostic reference levels for dental panoramic radiography in Greece.
    Manousaridis G; Koukorava C; Hourdakis CJ; Kamenopoulou V; Yakoumakis E; Tsiklakis K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):111-4. PubMed ID: 25836684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation dose as a factor in the choice of routine pre-operative dental radiographs.
    Tole NM; Guthua SW; Imalingat B
    East Afr Med J; 1993 May; 70(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 8306908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Absorbed doses from intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions.
    Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Holm B; Richter S
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(1-2):59-71. PubMed ID: 3458320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Radiation exposure of the ocular lens and thyroid gland in digital subtraction angiography of brain-supplying arteries].
    Heyne JP; Schleicher C; Söldner J; Neumann R; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 1997 Nov; 167(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 9440893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation absorbed doses in cephalography.
    Eliasson S; Julin P; Richter S; Stenström B
    Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 6585997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose reduction by direct-digital cephalometric radiography.
    Visser H; Rödig T; Hermann KP
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 11407766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose-area product measurements in panoramic dental radiology.
    Poppe B; Looe HK; Pfaffenberger A; Chofor N; Eenboom F; Sering M; Rühmann A; Poplawski A; Willborn K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(1):131-4. PubMed ID: 16905759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.