BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7754496)

  • 1. [Target dose markers. Exposure indicators for environmental epidemiological studies].
    Dybing E; Alexander J
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Apr; 115(10):1249-52. PubMed ID: 7754496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human biomonitoring: state of the art.
    Angerer J; Ewers U; Wilhelm M
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 May; 210(3-4):201-28. PubMed ID: 17376741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of DNA adducts to identify human health risk from exposure to hazardous environmental pollutants: the increasing role of mass spectrometry in assessing biologically effective doses of genotoxic carcinogens.
    Farmer PB; Singh R
    Mutat Res; 2008; 659(1-2):68-76. PubMed ID: 18468947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Biologically effective dose biomarkers].
    Miraglia N; Assennato G; Clonfero E; Fustinoni S; Sannolo N
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2004; 26(4):298-301. PubMed ID: 15584436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation between biomarkers of human exposure to genotoxins with focus on carcinogen-DNA adducts.
    Gyorffy E; Anna L; Kovács K; Rudnai P; Schoket B
    Mutagenesis; 2008 Jan; 23(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 17989146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects from environmental Mn exposures: a review of the evidence from non-occupational exposure studies.
    Hudnell HK
    Neurotoxicology; 1999; 20(2-3):379-97. PubMed ID: 10385898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Biomarkers of gentotoxic risk and metabolic polymorphism].
    Pavanello S; Clonfero E
    Med Lav; 2000; 91(5):431-69. PubMed ID: 11189784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biologic markers of exposure: current status and future research needs.
    Vine MF
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1996; 12(2):189-200. PubMed ID: 8794532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dosimetry of DNA and protein adducts in occupational health].
    Pavanello S; Clonfero E
    Med Lav; 1994; 85(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 7885291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human exposure assessment to environmental chemicals using biomonitoring.
    Calafat AM; Ye X; Silva MJ; Kuklenyik Z; Needham LL
    Int J Androl; 2006 Feb; 29(1):166-71; discussion 181-5. PubMed ID: 16466536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exposure biomarkers for the study of toxicological impact on carcinogenic processes.
    Farmer PB
    IARC Sci Publ; 2004; (157):71-90. PubMed ID: 15055291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of acceptable exposure levels to industrial and environmental pollutants: problems raised because of the interpretation of epidemiological data].
    Lauwerys R
    Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg; 1996; 151(5-6):295-303; discussion 304-5. PubMed ID: 9156670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biological markers and risk assessment.
    Goldstein BD
    Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):225-33. PubMed ID: 8744599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Children's exposure to environmental pollutants and biomarkers of genetic damage. I. Overview and critical issues.
    Neri M; Bonassi S; Knudsen LE; Sram RJ; Holland N; Ugolini D; Merlo DF
    Mutat Res; 2006 Jan; 612(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 16002329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [From industrial hygiene and toxicology to environmental hygiene and toxicology: problems and prospects].
    Carrer P; Cavallo D; Fustinoni S; Maroni M
    Med Lav; 2003; 94(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 12768957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of exposure in epidemiological studies: the example of silica dust.
    Dahmann D; Taeger D; Kappler M; Büchte S; Morfeld P; Brüning T; Pesch B
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 18(5):452-61. PubMed ID: 18059424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pooled analysis of epidemiological studies involving biological markers.
    Taioli E; Bonassi S
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2003 Mar; 206(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 12708232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toxicological considerations in the application and interpretation of DNA adducts in epidemiological studies.
    Swenberg JA
    IARC Sci Publ; 2004; (157):237-46. PubMed ID: 15055299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Carcinogen-DNA and protein adducts: biomarkers for cohort selection and modifiable endpoints in chemoprevention trials.
    Kensler TW; Groopman JD
    J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1996; 25():85-91. PubMed ID: 9027603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New developments in exposure assessment: the impact on the practice of health risk assessment and epidemiological studies.
    Nieuwenhuijsen M; Paustenbach D; Duarte-Davidson R
    Environ Int; 2006 Dec; 32(8):996-1009. PubMed ID: 16875734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.