BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7755088)

  • 1. On the value of the RADIUS (routine antenatal diagnostic imaging with ultrasound) study.
    Taylor WS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 May; 172(5):1641-2. PubMed ID: 7755088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Routine obstetric ultrasound.
    Skupski DW; Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1995 Sep; 50(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 8543105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical and ethical evaluation of routine obstetric ultrasound.
    Skupski DW; Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 6(5):435-9. PubMed ID: 7827274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound Study: another perspective.
    DeVore GR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):622-6. PubMed ID: 8090403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antenatal ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities: a systematic review of studies of cost and cost effectiveness.
    Roberts T; Henderson J; Mugford M; Bricker L; Neilson J; Garcia J
    BJOG; 2002 Jan; 109(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11843373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Routine ultrasound screening.
    Gomez KJ; Copel JA
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 6(5):426-9. PubMed ID: 7827272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a report from the Helsinki ultrasound trial.
    Leivo T; Tuominen R; Saari-Kemppainen A; Ylöstalo P; Karjalainen O; Heinonen OP
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May; 7(5):309-14. PubMed ID: 8774094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Routine second-trimester ultrasonography in the United States: a cost-benefit analysis.
    Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Smulian JC; Beazoglou T; Knuppel RA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Mar; 182(3):655-60. PubMed ID: 10739525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality by ultrasonic real time scanner.
    Hara K; Fujimoto Y; Tanaka H; Hayashi K; Yanagihara T; Jimbo T
    Early Hum Dev; 1992; 29(1-3):357-62. PubMed ID: 1396268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The cost of newborns transportation to the referral centers in comparison to the cost of the transport in-utero].
    Respondek-Liberska M; Sysa A; Gadzinowski J
    Ginekol Pol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 15181873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ACOG practice patterns. Routine ultrasound in low-risk pregnancy. Number 5, August 1997. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 Dec; 59(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 9486525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Routine examination by ultrasound for the detection of fetal malformations in a low risk population.
    Brocks V; Bang J
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1991; 6(1-2):37-45. PubMed ID: 1768345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal medicine--a reality thanks to ultrasound.
    Eik-Nes SH; Blaas HG; Tegnander E
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2004 May; 24(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 15165286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prenatal diagnosis of major congenital malformations.
    Whiteman VE; Reece EA
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 6(5):459-67. PubMed ID: 7827278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound detection of fetal abnormalities.
    Abramowicz JS; Jaffe R
    Pediatr Ann; 1996 Apr; 25(4):228-38. PubMed ID: 8731491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Role of routine ultrasound in pregnancy].
    Yanay N; Shalev E
    Harefuah; 1992 Mar; 122(5):312-4. PubMed ID: 1572578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advances in ultrasound technology.
    Rottem S
    J Ultrasound Med; 1995 Aug; 14(8):557. PubMed ID: 7474050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Obesity and the challenges of ultrasound fetal abnormality diagnosis.
    Tsai PJ; Loichinger M; Zalud I
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Apr; 29(3):320-7. PubMed ID: 25457860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antenatal diagnosis of aberrant umbilical vessels.
    Aoki S; Hata T; Ariyuki Y; Makihara K; Hata K; Kitao M
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1997; 43(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 9194620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduced costs of congenital anomalies from fetal ultrasound: are they sufficient to justify routine screening in the United States?
    Waitzman NJ; Romano PS
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Jun; 847():141-53. PubMed ID: 9668707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.