118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7755190)
1. Computer-aided semen analysis: sperm concentration assessment by the Strömberg-Mika system.
Togni G; Gallicciotti G; Coccia P; Piffaretti-Yanez A; Stamm J; Balerna M
Andrologia; 1995; 27(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 7755190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a computer-aided semen analysis system with sperm tail detection.
Wijchman JG; de Wolf BT; Jager S
Hum Reprod; 1995 Aug; 10(8):2090-5. PubMed ID: 8567847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between cell motion analyser, autosperm, and conventional semen analysis.
Kamtchouing P; Vermeulen L; Schoonjans F; Comhaire F
Andrologia; 1993; 25(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 8279707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved sperm kinematics in semen samples collected after 2 h versus 4-7 days of ejaculation abstinence.
Alipour H; Van Der Horst G; Christiansen OB; Dardmeh F; Jørgensen N; Nielsen HI; Hnida C
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1364-1372. PubMed ID: 28531319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated sperm morphometry and morphology analysis of canine semen by the Hamilton-Thorne analyser.
Rijsselaere T; Van Soom A; Hoflack G; Maes D; de Kruif A
Theriogenology; 2004 Oct; 62(7):1292-306. PubMed ID: 15325556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-assisted semen analysis: evaluation of method and assessment of the influence of sperm concentration on linear velocity determination.
Vantman D; Koukoulis G; Dennison L; Zinaman M; Sherins RJ
Fertil Steril; 1988 Mar; 49(3):510-5. PubMed ID: 3342904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation and usefulness of the Sperm Quality Analyzer (SQA II-C) for bull semen analysis.
Hoflack G; Rijsselaere T; Maes D; Dewulf J; Opsomer G; de Kruif A; Van Soom A
Reprod Domest Anim; 2005 Jun; 40(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 15943698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of semen analysis between the two Hamilton-Thorn semen analysers.
Agarwal A; Ozturk E; Loughlin KR
Andrologia; 1992; 24(6):327-9. PubMed ID: 1443674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the sperm class analyser CASA system for sperm counting in a busy diagnostic semen analysis laboratory.
Dearing CG; Kilburn S; Lindsay KS
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2014 Mar; 17(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 24359435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is flow cytometry really adapted to the determination of sperm concentration?
Lu JC; Chen F; Xu HR; Wu YM; Xia XY; Huang YF; Lu NQ
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2007; 67(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 17558894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Advances in standardization and quality control for the analysis of sperm quality parameters].
Huang YF; Lu JC
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2007 Nov; 13(11):963-8. PubMed ID: 18077904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of technical settings on canine semen motility parameters measured by the Hamilton-Thorne analyzer.
Rijsselaere T; Van Soom A; Maes D; de Kruif A
Theriogenology; 2003 Nov; 60(8):1553-68. PubMed ID: 14519475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part II. Determination of the working range of a computer-automated semen analyzer.
Johnson JE; Boone WR; Blackhurst DW
Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 8557133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Motility assessment of porcine spermatozoa: a comparison of methods.
Vyt P; Maes D; Rijsselaere T; Dejonckheere E; Castryck F; Van Soom A
Reprod Domest Anim; 2004 Dec; 39(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 15598237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of body weight, age and breeding history on canine sperm quality parameters measured by the Hamilton-Thorne analyser.
Rijsselaere T; Maes D; Hoflack G; de Kruif A; Van Soom A
Reprod Domest Anim; 2007 Apr; 42(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 17348970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of motility of ejaculated, liquid-stored boar spermatozoa using computerized instruments.
Tejerina F; Buranaamnuay K; Saravia F; Wallgren M; Rodriguez-Martinez H
Theriogenology; 2008 Jun; 69(9):1129-38. PubMed ID: 18358522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image cytometer method for automated assessment of human spermatozoa concentration.
Egeberg DL; Kjaerulff S; Hansen C; Petersen JH; Glensbjerg M; Skakkebaek NE; Jørgensen N; Almstrup K
Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):615-23. PubMed ID: 23606456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A multicenter study evaluating the flowcytometric-based kit for semen analysis.
Shai S; Roudebush W; Powers D; Dirnfeld M; Lamb DJ
Fertil Steril; 2005 Apr; 83(4):1034-8. PubMed ID: 15820817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of normal sperm morphology outcomes from two different computer-assisted semen analysis systems.
Coetzee K; Bermes N; Krause W; Menkveld R
Andrologia; 2001 May; 33(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 11380331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of FACSCount AF system, Improved Neubauer hemocytometer, Corning 254 photometer, SpermVision, UltiMate and NucleoCounter SP-100 for determination of sperm concentration of boar semen.
Hansen C; Vermeiden T; Vermeiden JP; Simmet C; Day BC; Feitsma H
Theriogenology; 2006 Dec; 66(9):2188-94. PubMed ID: 16920186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
