These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7756397)
1. [Completely implantable venous access systems. A study of the morbidity and benefits of a model third-generation device, the PAS Port with Cath-Finder]. Miguelena Bobadilla JM; Sousa Domínguez R; Güemes Sánchez A; Cabezali Sánchez R; Gil Romea I; Palacín García-Valiño R; Burdio Pinilla F Nutr Hosp; 1995; 10(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 7756397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cath-Finder Catheter Tracking System: a new device for positioning of central venous catheters. Early experience from implantation of brachial portal systems. Starkhammar H; Bengtsson M; Kay DA Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1990 May; 34(4):296-300. PubMed ID: 2343732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new peripherally implanted subcutaneous permanent central venous access device for patients requiring chemotherapy. Salem RR; Ward BA; Ravikumar TS J Clin Oncol; 1993 Nov; 11(11):2181-5. PubMed ID: 8229132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective evaluation of the Port-A-Cath implantable venous access system in chronically ill adults and children. Harvey WH; Pick TE; Reed K; Solenberger RI Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Dec; 169(6):495-500. PubMed ID: 2683154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Central venous access devices in treatment of patients with malignant tumors: venous port, central venous catheter and Hickman catheter. Cost-benefit analysis based on a critical review of the literature, personal experiences with 135 port implantations and patient attitude]. Krupski G; Fröschle GW; Weh FJ; Schlosser GA Chirurg; 1995 Mar; 66(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 7750390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population. Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peripherally placed totally implantable venous-access port systems of the forearm: clinical experience in 763 consecutive patients. Goltz JP; Scholl A; Ritter CO; Wittenberg G; Hahn D; Kickuth R Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Dec; 33(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 20414657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of Hickman line- and Port-a-Cath-associated complications in patients with solid tumours undergoing chemotherapy. Ng F; Mastoroudes H; Paul E; Davies N; Tibballs J; Hochhauser D; Mayer A; Begent R; Meyer T Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2007 Sep; 19(7):551-6. PubMed ID: 17517500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Central venous catheters for infusion therapy in gastrointestinal cancer. A comparative study of tunnelled centrally placed catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters. Snelling R; Jones G; Figueredo A; Major P J Intraven Nurs; 2001; 24(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 11836843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peripherally-placed central venous access ports: clinical and laboratory observations. Johnson JA; Didlake RH Am Surg; 1994 Dec; 60(12):915-9. PubMed ID: 7992964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A trial with a new peripheral implanted vascular access device. Winters V; Peters B; Coilá S; Jones L Oncol Nurs Forum; 1990; 17(6):891-6. PubMed ID: 2263515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The complications of central venous access systems: a study of 218 patients. Torramadé JR; Cienfuegos JA; Hernández JL; Pardo F; Benito C; González J; Balén E; de Villa V Eur J Surg; 1993; 159(6-7):323-7. PubMed ID: 8104491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of totally implanted reservoirs with external catheters as venous access devices in pediatric oncologic patients. Ross MN; Haase GM; Poole MA; Burrington JD; Odom LF Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 3400032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outpatient implantation of a central venous access system in gynecologic oncology patients. Shen-Gunther J; Mannel RS; Walker JL; Gold MA; Johnson GA J Reprod Med; 2003 Nov; 48(11):875-81. PubMed ID: 14686020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications associated with an implantable vascular access device. Dillon PA; Foglia RP J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Sep; 41(9):1582-7. PubMed ID: 16952595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Totally implantable venous access systems. Analysis of complications]. D'Angelo F; Ramacciato G; Caramitti A; Aurello P; Lauro S; Bordin F; Della Casa U Minerva Chir; 1997; 52(7-8):937-42. PubMed ID: 9411296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidence of mechanical malfunction in low-profile subcutaneous implantable venous access devices in patients receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies. Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Kimball KJ; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Estes JM; Alvarez RD Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Oct; 123(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 21742372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Subcutaneous chamber systems (ports) for long-term care in cancer patients]. Hájek R; Sevcík P; Ondrásek J; Mayer J; Vásová I; Král Z; Tomíska M; Krahulcová E; Penka M; Kubesová H Vnitr Lek; 1995 Jan; 41(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 7716888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]