These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7757026)
21. [Under what circumstances does the dressing have to be sterile?]. Faoro B; Rumeaux F Rev Infirm; 1997 Apr; (26):47-50. PubMed ID: 9216392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Dental equipment asepsis. Young JM Dent Clin North Am; 1991 Apr; 35(2):391-413. PubMed ID: 2032583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Aseptic processing contamination case studies and the pharmaceutical quality system. Friedman RL PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2005; 59(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 15971544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion. Raad II; Hohn DC; Gilbreath BJ; Suleiman N; Hill LA; Bruso PA; Marts K; Mansfield PF; Bodey GP Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1994 Apr; 15(4 Pt 1):231-8. PubMed ID: 8207189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Use of sterile dressings over needle cannulation sites. Brouwer DL ANNA J; 1996 Dec; 23(6):634-5. PubMed ID: 9069795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [The chain of asepsis in the orthodontic office]. Bassigny F Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1988; 22(3):337-73. PubMed ID: 3270153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Hygiene and asepsis methods in the dental office]. Morrier JJ; Barsotti O; Rocca JP Chir Dent Fr; 1991 Apr; 61(560):13-20. PubMed ID: 2070672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Clean versus sterile: Management of chronic wounds. Wooten MK; Hawkins K J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2001 Sep; 28(5):24A-26A. PubMed ID: 11557921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Bowel technique in the O.R. Is it really necessary? Porteous J; Gembey D; Dieter M Can Oper Room Nurs J; 1996; 14(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 8715690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Povidone-iodine ointment and gauze dressings associated with reduced catheter-related infection in seriously ill neurosurgical patients. Fukunaga A; Naritaka H; Fukaya R; Tabuse M; Nakamura T Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 25(8):696-8. PubMed ID: 15357164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantifying bacterial transfer from patients to staff during burns dressing and bed changes: implications for infection control. Bache SE; Maclean M; Gettinby G; Anderson JG; MacGregor SJ; Taggart I Burns; 2013 Mar; 39(2):220-8. PubMed ID: 23318217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of sampling methods for urine cultures. Unlü H; Sardan YC; Ulker S J Nurs Scholarsh; 2007; 39(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 18021132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Microbial contamination of water-soaked cotton gauze and its cause. Oie S; Yoshida H; Kamiya A Microbios; 2001; 104(409):159-66. PubMed ID: 11327110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Universal maximal sterile barrier precautions may be unnecessary. Kapadia F; Rodrigues C Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1994 Nov; 15(11):685-6. PubMed ID: 7852721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings. Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; van Hattem J J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18279292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Common breaks in sterile technique: clinical perspectives and perioperative implications. Hopper WR; Moss R AORN J; 2010 Mar; 91(3):350-64; quiz 365-7. PubMed ID: 20193800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]