BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7757031)

  • 1. Attitudes towards co-workers affected by occupational hearing loss. II: Focus groups interviews.
    Hétu R; Getty L; Waridel S
    Br J Audiol; 1994 Dec; 28(6):313-25. PubMed ID: 7757031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attitudes towards co-workers affected by occupational hearing loss. I: Questionnaire development and inquiry.
    Hétu R; Getty L; Beaudry J; Philibert L
    Br J Audiol; 1994 Dec; 28(6):299-311. PubMed ID: 7757030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a rehabilitation program for people affected with occupational hearing loss. 1. A new paradigm.
    Hétu R; Getty L
    Audiology; 1991; 30(6):305-16. PubMed ID: 1772381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reluctance to acknowledge hearing difficulties among hearing-impaired workers.
    Hétu R; Riverin L; Getty L; Lalande NM; St-Cyr C
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Aug; 24(4):265-76. PubMed ID: 2224292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychosocial disadvantages associated with occupational hearing loss as experienced in the family.
    Hétu R; Lalonde M; Getty L
    Audiology; 1987; 26(3):141-52. PubMed ID: 3662937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a rehabilitation program for people affected with occupational hearing loss. 2. Results from group intervention with 48 workers and their spouses.
    Getty L; Hétu R
    Audiology; 1991; 30(6):317-29. PubMed ID: 1772382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of knowledge and behavior toward hearing protection among workers in different workplaces and its influence factors].
    Yang M; Ou ZZ; Yang M; He P; He DK; Chen HQ; Liao XQ
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 36(6):413-415. PubMed ID: 30248733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting Thai workers' use of hearing protection.
    Tantranont K; Srisuphan W; Kaewthummanukul T; Suthakorn W; Jormsri P; Salazar MK
    AAOHN J; 2009 Nov; 57(11):455-63. PubMed ID: 19873942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working in noise with a hearing loss: perceptions from workers, supervisors, and hearing conservation program managers.
    Morata TC; Themann CL; Randolph RF; Verbsky BL; Byrne DC; Reeves ER
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):529-45. PubMed ID: 16377991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occupational hearing loss: an aural rehabilitation program for workers and their spouses, characteristics of the program and target group (participants and nonparticipants).
    Lalande NM; Riverin L; Lambert J
    Ear Hear; 1988 Oct; 9(5):248-55. PubMed ID: 3224772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing loss and perceptions of noise in the workplace among rural Australians.
    Williams W; Purdy S; Murray N; LePage E; Challinor K
    Aust J Rural Health; 2004 Jun; 12(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 15200522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceived susceptibility to noise induced hearing loss and attitude towards preventive care among metal workers at Gate, Ibadan: a pilot study.
    Osowole OS; Nwaorgu OG; Osisanya PA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2003 Sep; 32(3):231-3. PubMed ID: 15030078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States.
    Daniell WE; Swan SS; McDaniel MM; Camp JE; Cohen MA; Stebbins JG
    Occup Environ Med; 2006 May; 63(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 16551755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Awareness and knowledge as prerequisites for health oriented behavior].
    Zawadzka B
    Med Pr; 2002; 53(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 12701541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing protection use in manufacturing workers: a qualitative study.
    Reddy RK; Welch D; Thorne P; Ameratunga S
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(59):202-9. PubMed ID: 22918151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Qualitative analysis of the handicap associated with occupational hearing loss.
    Hétu R; Riverin L; Lalande N; Getty L; St-Cyr C
    Br J Audiol; 1988 Nov; 22(4):251-64. PubMed ID: 3242715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase factory workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Kazanis AS; Eakin BL; Hong O; Raymond DM
    Nurs Res; 2003; 52(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 14501543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Professionals with hearing loss: maintaining that competitive edge.
    Tye-Murray N; Spry JL; Mauzé E
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):475-84. PubMed ID: 19494776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Explaining Mexican American workers' hearing protection use with the health promotion model.
    Kerr MJ; Lusk SL; Ronis DL
    Nurs Res; 2002; 51(2):100-9. PubMed ID: 11984380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening protocols for the prevention of occupational noise-induced hearing loss: the role of conventional and extended high frequency audiometry may vary according to the years of employment.
    Riga M; Korres G; Balatsouras D; Korres S
    Med Sci Monit; 2010 Jul; 16(7):CR352-6. PubMed ID: 20581779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.