These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7758277)

  • 1. Effect of "Megafiller" insertion on the wear of composite resins.
    Tani Y; Togaya T; Ishikawa A; Watanabe Y; Maruyama K; Katsuyama S
    Dent Mater J; 1994 Dec; 13(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 7758277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction force of composite resin restorative inserted with "Megafiller".
    Tani Y; Nambu T; Ishikawa A; Katsuyama S
    Dent Mater J; 1993 Dec; 12(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 8004912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
    Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro wear of packable dental composites.
    Ferracane JL; Choi KK; Condon JR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (25):S60-6; quiz S74. PubMed ID: 11908398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro evaluation of wear and surface roughness of particulate filler composite resin after tooth brushing.
    Al Khuraif AA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):977-83. PubMed ID: 25220522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of a leucite-containing ceramic filler on the abrasive wear of dental composites.
    Atai M; Yassini E; Amini M; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1181-7. PubMed ID: 17507087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists.
    Stawarczyk B; Özcan M; Trottmann A; Schmutz F; Roos M; Hämmerle C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 23684283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the filler packing structures in dental resin composites: From theory to practice.
    Wang R; Habib E; Zhu XX
    Dent Mater; 2018 Jul; 34(7):1014-1023. PubMed ID: 29673709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the antagonistic wear of restorative materials when placed against human enamel.
    Suzuki S; Suzuki SH; Cox CF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Jan; 127(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 8568101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of material and configuration of antagonist on combined wear.
    Kato K; Kakuta K; Ogura H
    Dent Mater J; 2005 Sep; 24(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 16279726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of filler porosity on the abrasion resistance of nanoporous silica gel/polymer composites.
    Luo J; Lannutti JJ; Seghi RR
    Dent Mater; 1998 Jan; 14(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 9972148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Localized three-body wear of resin composites.
    Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():19-27. PubMed ID: 8935090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Localized wear and marginal integrity of posterior resin composites.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 7803009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal microleakage around class V cavities restored with glass ceramic inserts of different coefficients of thermal expansion.
    Tan CL; Santini A
    J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 15974221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A two-body frictional wear test.
    Wassell RW; McCabe JF; Walls AW
    J Dent Res; 1994 Sep; 73(9):1546-53. PubMed ID: 7929990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts.
    Rada RE
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 20830892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contemporary resin-based composite materials for direct placement restorations: packables, flowables and others.
    Combe EC; Burke FJ
    Dent Update; 2000 Sep; 27(7):326-32, 334-6. PubMed ID: 11218521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning.
    Amaral R; Ozcan M; Bottino MA; Valandro LF
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 16039705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.