These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7759708)

  • 1. Clinical predictors of the defibrillation threshold with the unipolar implantable defibrillation system.
    Raitt MH; Johnson G; Dolack GL; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PJ; Bardy GH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Jun; 25(7):1576-83. PubMed ID: 7759708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective, randomized comparison in humans of a unipolar defibrillation system with that using an additional superior vena cava electrode.
    Bardy GH; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Mehra R; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1994 Mar; 89(3):1090-3. PubMed ID: 8124794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective randomized comparison of biphasic waveform tilt using a unipolar defibrillation system.
    Poole JE; Bardy GH; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Raitt MH; Mehra R; Johnson G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jul; 18(7):1369-73. PubMed ID: 7567589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective randomized comparison in humans of biphasic waveform 60-microF and 120-microF capacitance pulses using a unipolar defibrillation system.
    Bardy GH; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Raitt MH; Jones GK; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1995 Jan; 91(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 7805224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds.
    Gold MR; Shorofsky SR; Bouhouch R; Joy RA; Kirby DS; Osman AF; Rashba EJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Apr; 13(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 12033348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lead system optimization for transvenous defibrillation.
    Gold MR; Foster AH; Shorofsky SR
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(9):1163-7. PubMed ID: 9359543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective, randomized, comparison in patients between a pectoral unipolar defibrillation system and that using an additional inferior vena cava electrode.
    Favale S; Dicandia CD; Tunzi P; Rizzon P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1140-5. PubMed ID: 10461288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of first-phase polarity of biphasic shocks on defibrillation threshold with a single transvenous lead system.
    Strickberger SA; Man KC; Daoud E; Neary MP; Horwood LE; Niebauer M; Hummel JD; Morady F
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Jun; 25(7):1605-8. PubMed ID: 7759712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective randomized evaluation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator size on unipolar defibrillation system efficacy.
    Jones GK; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Johnson G; DeGroot P; Gleva MJ; Raitt M; Bardy GH
    Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):2940-3. PubMed ID: 7586263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of shock polarity on ventricular defibrillation threshold using a transvenous lead system.
    Strickberger SA; Hummel JD; Horwood LE; Jentzer J; Daoud E; Niebauer M; Bakr O; Man KC; Williamson BD; Kou W
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Oct; 24(4):1069-72. PubMed ID: 7930199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A simplified, single-lead unipolar transvenous cardioversion-defibrillation system.
    Bardy GH; Johnson G; Poole JE; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Kelso D; Mitchell R; Mehra R; Hofer B
    Circulation; 1993 Aug; 88(2):543-7. PubMed ID: 8339416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical predictors of defibrillation energy requirements.
    Neuzner J; Bahawar H; Berkowitsch A; Michel U; Schlepper M; Pitschner HF
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jan; 79(2):205-6. PubMed ID: 9193027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system.
    Exner D; Yee R; Jones DL; Klein GJ; Mehra R
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Feb; 23(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 8294680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with single- or dual-coil defibrillation leads and active can.
    Lubiński A; Lewicka-Nowak E; Zienciuk A; Królak T; Kempa M; Pazdyga A; Raczak G; Swiatecka G
    Kardiol Pol; 2005 Sep; 63(3):234-41; discussion 242-3. PubMed ID: 16180177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictors of defibrillation efficacy in patients undergoing epicardial defibrillator implantation. The Multicenter Pacemaker-Cardioverter-Defibrillator (PCD) Investigators Group.
    Leitch JW; Yee R
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Jun; 21(7):1632-7. PubMed ID: 8496530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical predictors of atrial defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Brown T; Peters RW; Gold MR
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Jan; 2(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 15851265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of defibrillator-can size on defibrillation success with a single-lead unipolar system.
    Newby KH; Moredock L; Rembert J; Wharton JM; Natale A
    Am Heart J; 1996 Feb; 131(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 8579018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical predictors of transvenous defibrillation energy requirements.
    Khalighi K; Daly B; Leino EV; Shorofsky SR; Kavesh NG; Peters RW; Gold MR
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jan; 79(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 9193014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of transvenous coil position for active can defibrillation thresholds.
    Gold MR; Olsovsky MR; DeGroot PJ; Cuello C; Shorofsky SR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 11(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 10695457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transthoracic defibrillation of short-lasting ventricular fibrillation: a randomised trial for comparison of the efficacy of low-energy biphasic rectilinear and monophasic damped sine shocks.
    Szili-Torok T; Theuns D; Verblaauw T; Scholten M; Kimman GJ; Res J; Jordaens L
    Acta Cardiol; 2002 Oct; 57(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 12405569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.