These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7760667)

  • 21. Initial results with simultaneous analog and pulsatile stimulation of the cochlea.
    von Wallenberg EL; Hochmair ES; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():140-9. PubMed ID: 2356720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
    Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surgical treatment and rehabilitation of prelingually and perilingually deafened children and adults with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.
    García JM; Barón de Otero C; García J; Peñaranda A; Niño C; Campos S
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 8205978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Value of auditory evoked potentials of the brain stem in patients with a Digisonic cochlear implant].
    Truy E; Gallego S; Chanal JM; Collet L; Berger-Vachon C; Morgon A
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1997; 114(4):116-24. PubMed ID: 9686020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The choice between mono- and multielectrode implants in rehabilitation of total deafness in young children].
    Chouard CH; Meyer B; Fugain C; Garabedian N
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1991; 112(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 1775757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
    Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM; Chen XQ; Zhao XT; Kong Y; Li YX; Liu S; Liu B; Mo LY
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Preliminary results with the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Sep; 102(9):1006-13. PubMed ID: 1518346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Audiologic results with the MSP/MPEAK and WSP/F0F1F2 processors and coding strategies for the nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pijl S
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 7996630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Test of electrical stimulation of the round window. Diagnostic and prognostic value of the rehabilitation of total deafness by cochlear implant].
    Chouard CH; Koca E; Meyer B; Jacquier I
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994; 111(2):75-84. PubMed ID: 7825941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Partial insertion of the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant: technique and results.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB
    Am J Otol; 1993 Jul; 14(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 8238271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experience with the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.
    Lehnhardt E
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1991; 112(4):343-6. PubMed ID: 1775760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by multichannel cochlear implant - influence of C levels.
    Jin Y; Shinjo Y; Akamatsu Y; Ogata E; Nakamura M; Kianoush S; Yamasoba T; Kaga K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Mar; 128(3):284-90. PubMed ID: 18274914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Research advance of implementing schemes of cochlear implant and its speech processing algorithms].
    Han X; Nie K; Liu J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Jun; 20(2):340-4. PubMed ID: 12856615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cochlear implants in young children.
    Niparko JK; Blankenhorn R
    Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 2003; 9(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 14648819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Patients with trauma-induced deafness--rehabilitation using a cochlear implant].
    Mack KF; Kempf HG; Lenarz T
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(10):249-51. PubMed ID: 9324866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Comparison of the clinic results of speech processing strategies and latest advances on cochlear implant].
    Guan T; Ye D
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 23(5):1138-41. PubMed ID: 17121372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patient performance with the Cochlear Corporation "20 + 2" implant: bipolar versus monopolar activation.
    Zwolan TA; Kileny PR; Ashbaugh C; Telian SA
    Am J Otol; 1996 Sep; 17(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 8892567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.