These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. When texture takes precedence over motion in depth perception. O'Brien J; Johnston A Perception; 2000; 29(4):437-52. PubMed ID: 10953763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in determining perceived depth and perceived size. Bradshaw MF; Parton AD; Eagle RA Perception; 1998; 27(11):1317-31. PubMed ID: 10505177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence for good recovery of lengths of real objects seen with natural stereo viewing. Frisby JP; Buckley D; Duke PA Perception; 1996; 25(2):129-54. PubMed ID: 8733143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Depth from motion parallax scales with eye movement gain. Nawrot M J Vis; 2003 Dec; 3(11):841-51. PubMed ID: 14765966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The familiar-size cue to distance and stereoscopic depth perception. Predebon J Perception; 1993; 22(8):985-95. PubMed ID: 8190600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of object familiarity on magnitude estimates of apparent size. Predebon J Perception; 1992; 21(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 1528707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of familiar size at familiar distances. Fitzpatrick V; Pasnak R; Tyer ZE Perception; 1982; 11(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 7133938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Apparent motion of monocular stimuli in different depth planes with lateral head movements. Shimono K; Tam WJ; Ono H Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(8):1027-35. PubMed ID: 17337029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measures of perceived linear size, sagittal motion, and visual angle from optical expansions and contractions. Gogel WC; Eby DW Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jul; 59(5):783-806. PubMed ID: 9259645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Motion parallax driven by head movements: conditions for visual stability, perceived depth, and perceived concomitant motion. Ono H; Ujike H Perception; 2005; 34(4):477-90. PubMed ID: 15943054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detecting slant-in-depth of real trapezoidal and rectangular surfaces: moving-monocular viewing equivalent to stationary-binocular viewing. Reinhardt-Rutland AH J Gen Psychol; 1993 Apr; 120(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 8245918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reversals of visual depth caused by motion parallax. Hayashibe K Perception; 1991; 20(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 1945729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The roles of convergence and apparent distance in depth constancy with motion parallax. Rivest J; Ono H; Saida S Percept Psychophys; 1989 Nov; 46(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 2813024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Apparent relative size and depth of moving objects. Kaneko H; Uchikawa K Perception; 1993; 22(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 8414880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic death constancy. Collett TS; Schwarz U; Sobel EC Perception; 1991; 20(6):733-54. PubMed ID: 1816533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Influence of Monocular Spatial Cues on Vergence Eye Movements in Monocular and Binocular Viewing of 3-D and 2-D Stimuli. Batvinionak AA; Gracheva MA; Bolshakov AS; Rozhkova GI Perception; 2015; 44(8-9):1077-84. PubMed ID: 26562921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Familiar size affects the perceived size and distance of real objects even with binocular vision. Maltz MV; Stubbs KM; Quinlan DJ; Rzepka AM; Martin JR; Culham JC J Vis; 2021 Sep; 21(10):21. PubMed ID: 34581767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]