These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7761246)

  • 1. Modality-specific differences in the processing of spatially, temporally, and spatiotemporally distributed information.
    Mahar D; Mackenzie B; McNicol D
    Perception; 1994; 23(11):1369-86. PubMed ID: 7761246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences.
    Conway CM; Christiansen MH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jan; 31(1):24-39. PubMed ID: 15641902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discriminating speech rhythms in audition, vision, and touch.
    Navarra J; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():197-205. PubMed ID: 25046133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Partial recovery of visual-spatial remapping of touch after restoring vision in a congenitally blind man.
    Ley P; Bottari D; Shenoy BH; Kekunnaya R; Röder B
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 May; 51(6):1119-23. PubMed ID: 23499851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech perception using combinations of auditory, visual, and tactile information.
    Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Clark GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1989; 26(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 2521904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The cognitive and neural correlates of "tactile consciousness": a multisensory perspective.
    Gallace A; Spence C
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Mar; 17(1):370-407. PubMed ID: 17398116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual, auditory and tactile stimuli compete for early sensory processing capacities within but not between senses.
    Porcu E; Keitel C; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 97():224-35. PubMed ID: 24736186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of automatic orienting of attention towards ipsilesional stimuli in non-visual (tactile and auditory) neglect: a critical review.
    Gainotti G
    Cortex; 2010 Feb; 46(2):150-60. PubMed ID: 19501350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. To what extent do Gestalt grouping principles influence tactile perception?
    Gallace A; Spence C
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):538-61. PubMed ID: 21574680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.
    Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 18394521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial patterns in tactile perception: is there a tactile field?
    Haggard P; Giovagnoli G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 21470584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent emotional pictures modulate temporal order judgments of spatially separated audio-tactile stimuli.
    Jia L; Shi Z; Zang X; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 1537():156-63. PubMed ID: 24041776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing shapes our perception of time: temporal discrimination of tactile stimuli in deaf people.
    Bolognini N; Cecchetto C; Geraci C; Maravita A; Pascual-Leone A; Papagno C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Feb; 24(2):276-86. PubMed ID: 21916563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recalibration of multisensory simultaneity: cross-modal transfer coincides with a change in perceptual latency.
    Di Luca M; Machulla TK; Ernst MO
    J Vis; 2009 Nov; 9(12):7.1-16. PubMed ID: 20053098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tactile--visual temporal ventriloquism: no effect of spatial disparity.
    Keetels M; Vroomen J
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Jul; 70(5):765-71. PubMed ID: 18613625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing what the eyes see: auditory encoding of visual temporal sequences.
    Guttman SE; Gilroy LA; Blake R
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 15733204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Haptic and visual information speed up the neural processing of auditory speech in live dyadic interactions.
    Treille A; Cordeboeuf C; Vilain C; Sato M
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 57():71-7. PubMed ID: 24530236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rate of information segregation in developmentally dyslexic children.
    Laasonen M; Tomma-Halme J; Lahti-Nuuttila P; Service E; Virsu V
    Brain Lang; 2000 Oct; 75(1):66-81. PubMed ID: 11023639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.