345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7761506)
1. Late results of breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps: a prospective multicentric study.
Banic A; Boeckx W; Greulich M; Guelickx P; Marchi A; Rigotti G; Tschopp H
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1995 Jun; 95(7):1195-204; discussion 1205-6. PubMed ID: 7761506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Choice of recipient vessels in delayed TRAM flap breast reconstruction after radiotherapy.
Temple CL; Strom EA; Youssef A; Langstein HN
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Jan; 115(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 15622239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
Garvey PB; Buchel EW; Pockaj BA; Casey WJ; Gray RJ; Hernández JL; Samson TD
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. PubMed ID: 16651940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Pedicled versus free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction].
Galla TJ; Lukas B; Feller AM
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 1999 Mar; 31(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 10337558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. TRAM flap anatomy correlated with a 10-year clinical experience with 556 patients.
Watterson PA; Bostwick J; Hester TR; Bried JT; Taylor GI
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1995 Jun; 95(7):1185-94. PubMed ID: 7761505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the recipient vessel on fat necrosis after breast reconstruction with a free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap.
Kropf N; Macadam SA; McCarthy C; Disa JJ; Pusic AL; Da Lio A; Crisera C; Mehrara BJ
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2010 Apr; 44(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 20465509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.
Nahabedian MY; Momen B; Galdino G; Manson PN
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. PubMed ID: 12142662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction.
Chang DW; Wang B; Robb GL; Reece GP; Miller MJ; Evans GR; Langstein HN; Kroll SS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Apr; 105(5):1640-8. PubMed ID: 10809092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Free versus the pedicled TRAM flap: a cost comparison and outcome analysis.
Serletti JM; Moran SL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Nov; 100(6):1418-24; discussion 1425-7. PubMed ID: 9385952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of smoking on complications in patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
Chang DW; Reece GP; Wang B; Robb GL; Miller MJ; Evans GR; Langstein HN; Kroll SS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Jun; 105(7):2374-80. PubMed ID: 10845289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
Spear SL; Ducic I; Cuoco F; Taylor N
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Mar; 119(3):788-95. PubMed ID: 17312479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.
Kroll SS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 106(3):576-83. PubMed ID: 10987463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An outcome analysis comparing the thoracodorsal and internal mammary vessels as recipient sites for microvascular breast reconstruction: a prospective study of 100 patients.
Moran SL; Nava G; Behnam AB; Serletti JM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 May; 111(6):1876-82. PubMed ID: 12711947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.
Levine SM; Patel N; Disa JJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 22964681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate breast reconstruction: why the free TRAM over the conventional TRAM flap?
Schusterman MA; Kroll SS; Weldon ME
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1992 Aug; 90(2):255-61; discussion 262. PubMed ID: 1631217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. TRAM flaps in patients with abdominal scars.
Takeishi M; Shaw WW; Ahn CY; Borud LJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Mar; 99(3):713-22. PubMed ID: 9047191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Angiographic delay: a viable alternative to surgical delay.
Aboutanos SZ; Spinos E; Blanchet NP
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Jun; 68(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 21629075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Delay in unipedicled TRAM flap reconstruction of the breast: a review of 76 consecutive cases.
Erdmann D; Sundin BM; Moquin KJ; Young H; Georgiade GS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Sep; 110(3):762-7. PubMed ID: 12172136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Breast reconstruction using free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after resection of breast cancer].
Liu QH; Gupta A
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Sep; 21(5):328-31. PubMed ID: 16335373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
