These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7761593)

  • 1. [Estimating patient dose in radiologic examinations using conversion factors].
    Neumann K; Lemke AJ; Hosten N; Keske U
    Radiologe; 1995 Mar; 35(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 7761593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
    Boetticher Hv; Lachmund J; Looe HK; Hoffmann W; Poppe B
    Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Estimating patient dosage in radiologic examinations. Effective doses of the most frequent roentgen examinations].
    Keske U; Hierholzer J; Neumann K; Cordes M; Venz S; Amthauer H; Matschke S; Felix R
    Radiologe; 1995 Mar; 35(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 7761592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Estimating patient dose in computerized tomography].
    Lemke AJ; Neumann K; Hosten N; Schweiger U; Felix R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 7548254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning.
    Christner JA; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 20308486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A simple method for estimating effective dose in dental CT. Conversion factors and calculation examples for a clinical low dose protocol].
    Homolka P; Gahleitner A; Kudler H; Nowotny R
    Rofo; 2001 Jun; 173(6):558-62. PubMed ID: 11471298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation exposure in body computed tomography examinations of trauma patients.
    Kortesniemi M; Kiljunen T; Kangasmäki A
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(12):3269-82. PubMed ID: 16757876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Update of diagnostic medical and dental x-ray exposures in Romania.
    Sorop I; Mossang D; Iacob MR; Dadulescu E; Iacob O
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Dec; 28(4):563-71. PubMed ID: 19029586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CT radiation dose reduction by modifying primary factors.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Thrall JH; Mahesh M
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 May; 8(5):369-72. PubMed ID: 21531317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chest CT performed with 3D and z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique: breast and effective doses.
    Matsubara K; Takata T; Koshida K; Noto K; Shimono T; Horii J; Yamamoto T; Matsui O
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 19268857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations.
    Brix G; Lechel U; Glatting G; Ziegler SI; Münzing W; Müller SP; Beyer T
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Apr; 46(4):608-13. PubMed ID: 15809483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PET/CT and SPECT/CT dosimetry in children: the challenge to the pediatric imager.
    Gelfand MJ; Lemen LC
    Semin Nucl Med; 2007 Sep; 37(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 17707244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trends in radiation protection in CT: present and future status.
    Bischoff B; Hein F; Meyer T; Hadamitzky M; Martinoff S; Schömig A; Hausleiter J
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3 Suppl 2():S65-73. PubMed ID: 20129519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for monitoring patient dose in dental radiology.
    Helmrot E; Thilander-Klang A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):303-5. PubMed ID: 20223852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neutron fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients for embryo and fetus.
    Chen J; Meyerhof D; Vlahovich S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):693-8. PubMed ID: 15353732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo simulations of the dosimetry of chest tomosynthesis.
    Svalkvist A; Månsson LG; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):144-52. PubMed ID: 20200101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient radiation doses in cardiac computed tomography: comparison of published results with prospective and retrospective acquisition.
    Efstathopoulos EP; Pantos I; Thalassinou S; Argentos S; Kelekis NL; Zografos T; Panayiotakis G; Katritsis DG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 21324959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimated fluence-to-absorbed dose conversion coefficients for use in radiological protection of embryo and foetus against external exposure to photons from 50 keV to 10 GeV.
    Chen J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 16698964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. First results on patient dose measurements from conventional diagnostic radiology procedures in Serbia and Montenegro.
    Ciraj O; Marković S; Kosutić D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 15755772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.