These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7762152)

  • 1. On the accuracy of surface reconstruction from disparity interpolation.
    Yang Y; Blake R
    Vision Res; 1995 Apr; 35(7):949-60. PubMed ID: 7762152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thresholds for sine-wave corrugations defined by binocular disparity in random dot stereograms: Factor analysis of individual differences reveals two stereoscopic mechanisms tuned for spatial frequency.
    Peterzell DH; Serrano-Pedraza I; Widdall M; Read JCA
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():127-135. PubMed ID: 29155009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disparity modulation sensitivity for narrow-band-filtered stereograms.
    Lee B; Rogers B
    Vision Res; 1997 Jul; 37(13):1769-77. PubMed ID: 9274764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Depth in anticorrelated stereograms: effects of spatial density and interocular delay.
    Cogan AI; Lomakin AJ; Rossi AF
    Vision Res; 1993 Sep; 33(14):1959-75. PubMed ID: 8249313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anisotropies in the perception of stereoscopic surfaces: the role of orientation disparity.
    Cagenello R; Rogers BJ
    Vision Res; 1993 Nov; 33(16):2189-201. PubMed ID: 8273286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. First and second-order contributions to surface interpolation.
    Wilcox LM
    Vision Res; 1999 Jul; 39(14):2335-47. PubMed ID: 10367055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disparity averaging across spatial scales.
    Rohaly AM; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 1994 May; 34(10):1315-25. PubMed ID: 8023439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The time course of 2-D shape discrimination in random dot stereograms.
    Glennerster A
    Vision Res; 1996 Jul; 36(13):1955-68. PubMed ID: 8759435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanisms underlying the anisotropy of stereoscopic tilt perception.
    Mitchison GJ; McKee SP
    Vision Res; 1990; 30(11):1781-91. PubMed ID: 2288090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Depth cue integration: stereopsis and image blur.
    Mather G; Smith DR
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(25):3501-6. PubMed ID: 11115677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative shear disparities and the perception of surface inclination.
    Howard IP; Kaneko H
    Vision Res; 1994 Oct; 34(19):2505-17. PubMed ID: 7975290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatio-temporal requirements for binocular correlation in stereopsis.
    Lankheet MJ; Lennie P
    Vision Res; 1996 Feb; 36(4):527-38. PubMed ID: 8854998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for elongated receptive field structure for mechanisms subserving stereopsis.
    Chen CC; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2691-702. PubMed ID: 16580041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stereoacuity thresholds in the presence of a reference surface.
    Andrews TJ; Glennerster A; Parker AJ
    Vision Res; 2001 Oct; 41(23):3051-61. PubMed ID: 11704242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The orientation bandwidth of cyclopean channels.
    Hibbard PB
    Vision Res; 2005 Oct; 45(21):2780-5. PubMed ID: 16040077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fine-to-coarse scale disambiguation in stereopsis.
    Smallman HS
    Vision Res; 1995 Apr; 35(8):1047-60. PubMed ID: 7762161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal integration of shading and binocular disparity for depth perception.
    Lovell PG; Bloj M; Harris JM
    J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 22214563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discrimination of the spatial derivatives of horizontal binocular disparity.
    Lunn PD; Morgan MJ
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1997 Feb; 14(2):360-71. PubMed ID: 9014355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stereoacuity and colour contrast.
    Kingdom FA; Simmons DR
    Vision Res; 1996 May; 36(9):1311-9. PubMed ID: 8711909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.