These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7762156)

  • 1. A reflectometric technique for assessing photoreceptor alignment.
    Gorrand JM; Delori F
    Vision Res; 1995 Apr; 35(7):999-1010. PubMed ID: 7762156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct measurement of human-cone-photoreceptor alignment.
    Burns SA; Wu S; Delori F; Elsner AE
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1995 Oct; 12(10):2329-38. PubMed ID: 7500214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cone spacing and waveguide properties from cone directionality measurements.
    Marcos S; Burns SA
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1999 May; 16(5):995-1004. PubMed ID: 10234854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The directionality of photoreceptors in the human retina.
    Gorrand JM
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2006; (302):215-29. PubMed ID: 17265800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Photoreceptor orientation in iris coloboma.
    Bailey JE; Lakshminarayanan V; Enoch JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 1994 Feb; 71(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 8152744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous measurement of foveal spectral reflectance and cone-photoreceptor directionality.
    Zagers NP; van de Kraats J; Berendschot TT; van Norren D
    Appl Opt; 2002 Aug; 41(22):4686-96. PubMed ID: 12153104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Induced movement of receptor alignment toward a new pupillary aperture.
    Applegate RA; Bonds AB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1981 Dec; 21(6):869-72. PubMed ID: 7309438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of cone directionality determined by psychophysical and reflectometric techniques.
    He JC; Marcos S; Burns SA
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1999 Oct; 16(10):2363-9. PubMed ID: 10517020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Volumetric integration model of the Stiles-Crawford effect of the first kind and its experimental verification.
    Vohnsen B; Carmichael A; Sharmin N; Qaysi S; Valente D
    J Vis; 2017 Oct; 17(12):18. PubMed ID: 29090313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Directionality and alignment of the foveal receptors, assessed with light scattered from the human fundus in vivo.
    van Blokland GJ
    Vision Res; 1986; 26(3):495-500. PubMed ID: 3727414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Directionality of individual cone photoreceptors in the parafoveal region.
    Morris HJ; Blanco L; Codona JL; Li SL; Choi SS; Doble N
    Vision Res; 2015 Dec; 117():67-80. PubMed ID: 26494187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of the Stiles-Crawford (S-C) function at 35 degrees in the temporal field and the stability of the foveal S-C function peak over time.
    Bedell HE; Enoch JM
    J Opt Soc Am; 1979 Mar; 69(3):435-42. PubMed ID: 458510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dependence of the magnitude of the Stiles-Crawford effect on retinal location.
    Westheimer G
    J Physiol; 1967 Sep; 192(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 6050150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual consequences of the foveal pit.
    Williams DR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1980 Jun; 19(6):653-67. PubMed ID: 7380624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parametric representation of Stiles-Crawford functions: normal variation of peak location and directionality.
    Applegate RA; Lakshminarayanan V
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1993 Jul; 10(7):1611-23. PubMed ID: 8350150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vertebrate receptor optics and orientation.
    Enoch JM
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1980 Apr; 48(2):373-88. PubMed ID: 6995055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring retinal contributions to the optical Stiles-Crawford effect with optical coherence tomography.
    Gao W; Cense B; Zhang Y; Jonnal RS; Miller DT
    Opt Express; 2008 Apr; 16(9):6486-501. PubMed ID: 18516251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between retinal receptor orientation and photoreceptor optics.
    Enoch JM
    Int Ophthalmol Clin; 1978; 18(2):41-80. PubMed ID: 681129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for alteration in photoreceptor orientation.
    Enoch JM; Birch DG
    Ophthalmology; 1980 Aug; 87(8):821-34. PubMed ID: 7053161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Stiles-Crawford effect--explanation and consequences.
    Snyder AW; Pask C
    Vision Res; 1973 Jun; 13(6):1115-37. PubMed ID: 4713922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.