These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7762939)

  • 1. Quality data: what are they?
    Sforza VA
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1994; 30(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 7762939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality assurance responsibilities as defined by the EPA Good Automated Laboratory Practices (GALPs).
    Fielder FG; Eleuteri BA; Gross EM
    Qual Assur; 1993; 2(1-2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8156208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ensuring quality of in vitro alternative test methods: issues and answers.
    Gupta K; Rispin A; Stitzel K; Coecke S; Harbell J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Dec; 43(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 16099570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Critical selection of toxicological data on chemicals. The example of the International Register of Potentially Toxic Chemicals data bank.
    Menditto A; Ouane-Keita F; Chiodo F; Caroli S
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1994; 30(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 7762937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Good research practices: a commonsense approach to ensuring quality in research facilities.
    Herman DR; Usher RW
    Qual Assur; 1994 Dec; 3(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 7613744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
    Benedetto AR
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status.
    Box RJ; Spielmann H
    Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.
    TenBrook PL; Tjeerdema RS; Hann P; Karkoski J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 199():19-109. PubMed ID: 19110939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neurotoxicity test validation, positive controls and proficiency: are chemicals necessary?
    Maurissen JP; Marable BR
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2005; 27(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 16026966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biologically based validation of PC electrophysiology data collection systems utilizing the Good Automated Laboratory Practices.
    Jones RD; Weyrauch TA; Bailey SR; Halder CA
    Qual Assur; 1997; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 9170171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality assurance in occupational and environmental laboratory medicine.
    Menditto A; Apostoli P; Aitio A
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1996; 32(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 8913037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of data quality for the NHEXAS--Part II: Minnesota children's pesticide exposure study (MNCPES).
    Pellizzari ED; Smith DJ; Clayton CA; Quackenboss JJ
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2003 Nov; 13(6):465-79. PubMed ID: 14603347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The OECD policy for the implementation of the principles of good laboratory practice.
    Turnheim D
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1994; 30(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 7762932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A qualitative retrospective analysis of positive control data in developmental neurotoxicity studies.
    Crofton KM; Makris SL; Sette WF; Mendez E; Raffaele KC
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 15113596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?
    Massol J; Puech A; Boissel JP;
    Therapie; 2007; 62(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 18206104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Quality assurance in food microbiology laboratories].
    Cwiek-Ludwicka K; Windyga B; Karłowski K
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1996; 47(4):359-69. PubMed ID: 9102793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pathology data quality assurance and data retrieval at the National Center for Toxicological Research.
    Henry RL; Johnson CR
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol; 1980; 3(3 Spec No):169-78. PubMed ID: 7365378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.