These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 776379)

  • 1. Cervical cancer screening programs. II. Screening for carcinoma of the cervix.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1976 Jun; 114(11):1013-26. PubMed ID: 776379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix and utilization of the Papanicolaou smear technique.
    Lee RE
    Proc Inst Med Chic; 1979; 32(7):142-4, 153. PubMed ID: 392500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does cervical cancer screening do more harm than good?
    Payne L; Lavis P
    Nurs Times; 2001 Jul 19-25; 97(29):20. PubMed ID: 11957496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of a cancer control programme.
    Knox EG; Woodman CB
    Cancer Surv; 1988; 7(3):379-401. PubMed ID: 3242791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for cancer of the cervix in elderly women.
    Fletcher A
    Lancet; 1990 Jan; 335(8681):97-9. PubMed ID: 1967429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Report of a national workshop on screening for cancer of the cervix.
    Anderson GH
    CMAJ; 1992 Apr; 146(8):1280; author reply 1280, 1284-5. PubMed ID: 1555154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The screening muddle.
    Lancet; 1998 Feb; 351(9101):459. PubMed ID: 9482430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Present status of mass screening of cancer of the uterine cervix].
    Kutsuzawa T; Moriya S; Okubo H; Sakuragi N; Ichinohe K
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1986 Jul; 61(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 3758914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mass screening programmes and trends in cervical cancer in Finland and the Netherlands.
    van der Aa MA; Pukkala E; Coebergh JW; Anttila A; Siesling S
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Apr; 122(8):1854-8. PubMed ID: 18067129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer.
    Chamberlain J
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):161-8. PubMed ID: 3570402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Results of early diagnosis of cervix carcinoma between 1962-1968].
    Kohl H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1970 May; 92(22):691-9. PubMed ID: 5513142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pitfalls in the screening and early diagnosis of cervical cancer.
    Wain GV; Hacker NF
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 2(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 2102310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative vaginal smears].
    Weintraub D
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Nov; 117(11):921. PubMed ID: 9471658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical smear policy.
    Lancet; 1985 Dec; 2(8467):1305. PubMed ID: 2866368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Papanicolaou cervical smears for screening in asymptomatic women.
    Barnes BA
    Prim Care; 1981 Mar; 8(1):131-40. PubMed ID: 6911755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cervical cancer screening. False negative smears].
    Vassilakos P; De Marval F; Muñoz M
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 9340714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The impending loss of screening for cervix uteri carcinoma in the Netherlands].
    Lammes FB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1986 Apr; 130(15):673-4. PubMed ID: 3703044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The pitfalls of cervical cancer screening.
    Sedlis A
    Contrib Gynecol Obstet; 1991; 18():103-14. PubMed ID: 1657521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Walton report and its subsequent impact on cervical cancer screening programs in Canada.
    Worth AJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 6694805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Significance of cytologic screening for prevention of cervix carcinoma].
    Collette HJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1975 May; 119(20):795-800. PubMed ID: 1161072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.