BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7764351)

  • 1. Crossflow microfiltration of yeast suspensions in tubular filters.
    Redkar SG; Davis RH
    Biotechnol Prog; 1993; 9(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 7764351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting the performance of crossflow filtration of yeast cell suspension.
    Tanaka T; Kamimura R; Itoh K; Nakanishi K; Matsuno R
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1993 Mar; 41(6):617-24. PubMed ID: 18609597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kinetics of Permeate Flux Decline in Crossflow Membrane Filtration of Colloidal Suspensions.
    Hong S; Faibish RS; Elimelech M
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1997 Dec; 196(2):267-277. PubMed ID: 9792752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling the influence of slurry concentration on Saccharomyces cerevisiae cake porosity and resistance during microfiltration.
    Mota M; Flickinger MC
    Biotechnol Prog; 2012; 28(6):1534-41. PubMed ID: 23011664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new coiled hollow-fiber module design for enhanced microfiltration performance in biotechnology.
    Luque S; Mallubhotla H; Gehlert G; Kuriyel R; Dzengeleski S; Pearl S; Belfort G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1999 Nov; 65(3):247-57. PubMed ID: 10486122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microfiltration of yeast suspensions with self-cleaning spiral vortices: possibilities for a new membrane module design.
    Mallubhotla H; Nunes E; Belfort G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1995 Nov; 48(4):375-85. PubMed ID: 18623498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of added yeast on protein transmission and flux in cross-flow membrane microfiltration.
    Kuberkar VT; Davis RH
    Biotechnol Prog; 1999 May; 15(3):472-9. PubMed ID: 10356265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pilot-scale harvest of recombinant yeast employing microfiltration: a case study.
    Russotti G; Osawa AE; Sitrin RD; Buckland BC; Adams WR; Lee SS
    J Biotechnol; 1995 Oct; 42(3):235-46. PubMed ID: 7576542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Interparticle Electrostatic Double Layer Interactions on Permeate Flux Decline in Crossflow Membrane Filtration of Colloidal Suspensions: An Experimental Investigation.
    Faibish RS; Elimelech M; Cohen Y
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1998 Aug; 204(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 9665769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Crossflow filtration of yeast broth cultivated in molasses.
    Tanaka T; Kamimura R; Fujiwara R; Nakanishi K
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1994 May; 43(11):1094-101. PubMed ID: 18615521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of pore size, shear rate, and harvest time during the constant permeate flux microfiltration of CHO cell culture supernatant.
    Stressmann M; Moresoli C
    Biotechnol Prog; 2008; 24(4):890-7. PubMed ID: 19194898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of cake properties in traditional and turbulence promoter assisted microfiltration of particulate suspensions.
    Liu Y; He G; Li B; Hu Z; Ju J
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2535-44. PubMed ID: 22386328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microfiltration of recombinant yeast cells using a rotating disk dynamic filtration system.
    Lee SS; Burt A; Russotti G; Buckland B
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1995 Nov; 48(4):386-400. PubMed ID: 18623499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Membrane fouling by cell-protein mixtures: in situ characterisation using multi-photon microscopy.
    Hughes DJ; Cui Z; Field RW; Tirlapur UK
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Apr; 96(6):1083-91. PubMed ID: 16933334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flux enhancement for membrane filtration of bacterial suspensions using high-frequency backpulsing.
    Kuberkar V; Czekaj P; Davis R
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1998 Oct; 60(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 10099408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting membrane flux decline from complex mixtures using flow-field flow fractionation measurements and semi-empirical theory.
    Pellegrino J; Wright S; Ranvill J; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):85-92. PubMed ID: 16003965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of ultra- and microfiltration in the presence and absence of secondary flow with polysaccharides, proteins, and yeast suspensions.
    Gehlert G; Luque S; Belfort G
    Biotechnol Prog; 1998; 14(6):931-42. PubMed ID: 9841658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-phase bioconversion product recovery by microfiltration I. Steady state studies.
    Conrad PB; Lee SS
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1998 Mar; 57(6):631-41. PubMed ID: 10099243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Yeast Cell Cake Characterization in Alcohol Solution for Efficient Microfiltration.
    Katagiri N; Tomimatsu K; Date K; Iritani E
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33513956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transient and stationary operating conditions on performance of lactic acid bacteria crossflow microfiltration.
    Boyaval P; Lavenant C; Gésan G; Daufin G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1996 Jan; 49(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 18623556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.