BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7766782)

  • 1. Properties of alternative estimators of familial correlations under variable sibship size.
    Vogler GP; Wette R; McGue MK; Rao DC
    Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):276-83. PubMed ID: 7766782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the properties of maximum likelihood estimators of familial correlations under variable sibship size.
    Wette R; McGue MK; Rao DC; Cloninger CR
    Biometrics; 1988 Sep; 44(3):717-25. PubMed ID: 3203127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of recent estimators of interclass correlation from familial data.
    Eliasziw M; Donner A
    Biometrics; 1990 Jun; 46(2):391-8. PubMed ID: 2364129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Monte Carlo evaluation of three statistical methods used in path analysis.
    McGue M; Wette R; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(2):129-55. PubMed ID: 3582958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eight interval estimators of a common rate ratio under stratified Poisson sampling.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1283-96. PubMed ID: 15083483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Homogeneity/heterogeneity hypotheses for standardized mortality ratios based on minimum power-divergence estimators.
    Pardo L; Martín N
    Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):819-36. PubMed ID: 19827057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nearly unbiased estimators for the three-parameter Weibull distribution with greater efficiency than the iterative likelihood method.
    Cousineau D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):167-91. PubMed ID: 18177546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the intraclass correlation parameter for binary data.
    Saha KK; Paul SR
    Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3497-512. PubMed ID: 16007569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variance-component estimation from human sibship data.
    Donner A; Koval JJ
    Biometrics; 1983 Sep; 39(3):599-605. PubMed ID: 6652196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The estimation of intraclass correlation in the analysis of family data.
    Donner A; Koval JJ
    Biometrics; 1980 Mar; 36(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 7370372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonrandom sampling in genetic epidemiology: an implementation of the Hanis-Chakraborty method for multifactorial analysis.
    Rao DC; Wette R
    Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(3):461-70. PubMed ID: 2753354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias in misspecified mixtures.
    Gray G
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):457-70. PubMed ID: 8068845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Receiver operating characteristic studies and measurement errors.
    Coffin M; Sukhatme S
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):823-37. PubMed ID: 9333348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data.
    Cordell HJ; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
    McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confidence interval estimation of the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary outcome data.
    Zou G; Donner A
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):807-11. PubMed ID: 15339305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. N-mixture models for estimating population size from spatially replicated counts.
    Royle JA
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 15032780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Small-sample bias of point estimators of the odds ratio from matched sets.
    Jewell NP
    Biometrics; 1984 Jun; 40(2):421-35. PubMed ID: 6487726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of two bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations.
    Lu B; Preisser JS; Qaqish BF; Suchindran C; Bangdiwala SI; Wolfson M
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):935-41. PubMed ID: 17825023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.