These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7767167)

  • 1. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? Rate of appeal may be higher elsewhere.
    Naik PC; Klenka L
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1195-6; author reply 1197. PubMed ID: 7767167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? Low appeal rate may reflect trust in doctors' judgment.
    Burns T; Raphael F
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1196. PubMed ID: 7767168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? Managers should review patients who do not appeal.
    Langley G
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1196; author reply 1197. PubMed ID: 7767169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? Intellectually elite are more likely to appeal.
    O'Dwyer J; Whitton I
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1196. PubMed ID: 7632237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? New Zealand's system has much to offer.
    Turner TH
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1196-7. PubMed ID: 7767170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act?
    Bradley C; Marshall M; Gath D
    BMJ; 1995 Feb; 310(6976):364-7. PubMed ID: 7632216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? Possible problem with section 12.
    Price JH
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1197. PubMed ID: 7767173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appeals to the Mental Health Review Tribunal in an ageing population.
    Deshpande N; Morton T; Haque S; Oyebode F
    Med Sci Law; 2008 Jul; 48(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 18754213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current appeal system for those detained in England and Wales under the Mental Health Act needs reform.
    Gosney P; Lomax P; Hooper C; O'Brien A
    J Med Ethics; 2019 Mar; 45(3):173-177. PubMed ID: 30514756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Appeal against detention under the Mental Health Act 1983: relationship to age and incapacity.
    Rimmer MA; O'Connor S; Anderson D
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2002 Sep; 17(9):884-5. PubMed ID: 12221664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detention under section 136: Why is it increasing?
    Loughran M
    Med Sci Law; 2018 Oct; 58(4):268-274. PubMed ID: 30027815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patients' rights and the Mental Health Act.
    Edeh J
    Lancet; 1987 Jan; 1(8523):45. PubMed ID: 2879125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How and when to apply the Mental Health Act.
    Matthews K; Milne S
    Practitioner; 1994 May; 238(1538):398, 401-4. PubMed ID: 8183829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detention of potentially dangerous people.
    Lancet; 1998 Nov; 352(9141):1641. PubMed ID: 9853429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protecting the rights of detained patients.
    Barnes M
    Med Law; 1996; 15(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 9009596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aspects of Mental Health Act 1990 in New South Wales Australia.
    Singh S
    Med Law; 1996; 15(3):441-6. PubMed ID: 9009595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Powers of detention: a two-edged sword.
    Shanley E
    Nurs Mirror; 1983 May; 156(20):10. PubMed ID: 6552599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk, detention and evidence: humanizing mental health reform.
    Freshwater D; Westwood T
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2006 Jun; 13(3):257-9. PubMed ID: 16737491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Mental Health Act and professional hostage taking.
    Mason T; Jennings L
    Med Sci Law; 1997 Jan; 37(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 9029923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compulsory detention in hospital under the Mental Health Act 1983.
    Briscoe M; Harris B
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 May; 294(6580):1141-4. PubMed ID: 3107730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.