These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7767169)

  • 1. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? Managers should review patients who do not appeal.
    Langley G
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1196; author reply 1197. PubMed ID: 7767169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? Intellectually elite are more likely to appeal.
    O'Dwyer J; Whitton I
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1196. PubMed ID: 7632237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act?
    Bradley C; Marshall M; Gath D
    BMJ; 1995 Feb; 310(6976):364-7. PubMed ID: 7632216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? Rate of appeal may be higher elsewhere.
    Naik PC; Klenka L
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1195-6; author reply 1197. PubMed ID: 7767167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? Low appeal rate may reflect trust in doctors' judgment.
    Burns T; Raphael F
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1196. PubMed ID: 7767168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? New Zealand's system has much to offer.
    Turner TH
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1196-7. PubMed ID: 7767170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act? Possible problem with section 12.
    Price JH
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6988):1197. PubMed ID: 7767173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appeals to the Mental Health Review Tribunal in an ageing population.
    Deshpande N; Morton T; Haque S; Oyebode F
    Med Sci Law; 2008 Jul; 48(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 18754213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detention of potentially dangerous people.
    Lancet; 1998 Nov; 352(9141):1641. PubMed ID: 9853429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Powers of detention: a two-edged sword.
    Shanley E
    Nurs Mirror; 1983 May; 156(20):10. PubMed ID: 6552599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protecting the rights of detained patients.
    Barnes M
    Med Law; 1996; 15(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 9009596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk, detention and evidence: humanizing mental health reform.
    Freshwater D; Westwood T
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2006 Jun; 13(3):257-9. PubMed ID: 16737491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Mental Health Act and professional hostage taking.
    Mason T; Jennings L
    Med Sci Law; 1997 Jan; 37(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 9029923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychiatry. 1. Powers of detention.
    Dimond B
    Nurs Mirror; 1983 Sep; 157(13):35. PubMed ID: 6555815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends in the Mental Health Act Review Tribunals: a Welsh experience 2004-2008.
    Aziz VM
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2009 Oct; 16(7):375-7. PubMed ID: 19733323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Mental Health Act 1983 in practice.
    Bluglass R
    Med Leg J; 1987; 55 ( Pt 3)():151-65. PubMed ID: 3320716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mental Health Act 1983: guardianship order and definition of mental impairment.
    Singh TH
    BMJ; 1989 Nov; 299(6710):1284. PubMed ID: 2513920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Appeal against detention under the Mental Health Act 1983: relationship to age and incapacity.
    Rimmer MA; O'Connor S; Anderson D
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2002 Sep; 17(9):884-5. PubMed ID: 12221664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Legislation concerning patients' rights in Israel and in Britain.
    Levy A; Davidson S
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1986; 23(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 3804693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Mental Capacity Act isn't working.
    Spencer-Lane T
    Ment Health Today; 2010 Sep; ():26. PubMed ID: 20949686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.