These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7767189)

  • 1. US doctors win life support lawsuit.
    Rutter TL
    BMJ; 1995 May; 310(6989):1223-4. PubMed ID: 7767189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of a DNR order over family objections: the case of Gilgunn v. MGH.
    Paris JJ; Cassem EH; Dec GW; Reardon FE
    J Intensive Care Med; 1999; 14(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 11657848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Court ruling limits rights of patients: care deemed futile may be withheld.
    Kolata G
    N Y Times Web; 1995 Apr; ():6. PubMed ID: 11647064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abandoning a waning life.
    Capron AM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(4):24-6. PubMed ID: 7591722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients.
    Luce JM
    West J Med; 1997 Dec; 167(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 9426480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Futility and the goals of medicine.
    Rhodes R
    J Clin Ethics; 1998; 9(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 9750993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Withholding care from patients: Boston case asks who decides.
    Kolata G
    N Y Times Web; 1995 Apr; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11647996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Gilgunn case: courage and questions.
    Orr R
    J Intensive Care Med; 1999; 14(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 11657849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patients should not always come first in treatment decisions.
    Strong C
    J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 8490224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In the Superior Court of Fulton County, State of Georgia.
    Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 1563941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Liability of ethics consultants: a case analysis.
    DuVal G
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1997; 6(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 9253494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do not resuscitate order challenged in court.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1996 Feb; 312(7028):399-400. PubMed ID: 8601107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Making sense of State v Messenger.
    Clark FI
    Pediatrics; 1996 Apr; 97(4):579-83. PubMed ID: 8632948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nguyen v. Sacred Heart Medical Center.
    Altomare J; Bolde M
    Issues Law Med; 1995; 11(2):199-201. PubMed ID: 7591667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physicians' disagreements about life-sustaining treatments: a case study.
    Gordon LJ; Weiss AH
    HEC Forum; 1999 Jun; 11(2):101-21. PubMed ID: 11184848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Futility: are goals the problem? Part Two.
    Gregory DR; Cotler MP
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 8032513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In re Michael Martin.
    Davis SM
    Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 7829309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In re Donald McCarthy.
    Harburg M
    Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 7960666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In re Martin.
    Towner H
    Issues Law Med; 1996; 12(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 9029842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do not resuscitate (DNR) orders.
    Byrd C
    Prog Cardiovasc Nurs; 1994; 9(1):45-6. PubMed ID: 8058696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.