These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7769521)

  • 21. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Corticotomy-assisted orthodontic camouflage in a class III adult patient with a severe transverse discrepancy.
    Gracco A; Finotti M; Bruno G; de Stefani A
    Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):268-280. PubMed ID: 29628425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A prospective study of the short-term treatment effects of the acrylic-splint rapid maxillary expander combined with the lower Schwarz appliance.
    Wendling LK; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15747809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Outcomes and stability in patients with anterior open bite and long anterior face height treated with temporary anchorage devices and a maxillary intrusion splint.
    Scheffler NR; Proffit WR; Phillips C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 25439210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on the mandibular position.
    Yamaguchi K; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Nov; 100(5):443-52. PubMed ID: 1951197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. First or second premolar extraction effects on facial vertical dimension.
    Kim TK; Kim JT; Mah J; Yang WS; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Mar; 75(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 15825779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
    Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of nitanium maxillary expander appliances on dentofacial structures.
    Karaman AI
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):344-54. PubMed ID: 12169035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perspectives in posterior vertical dimension: three case reports.
    Alexander S; Jumlongras D; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(4):301-13. PubMed ID: 10551130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Spahl split vertical appliance.
    Spahl TJ
    Funct Orthod; 1992; 9(2):27-33. PubMed ID: 1452049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The orthodontic treatment of deep bite in adults--a comparison of the straight-wire appliance and the segmented arch technic].
    Weiland F; Bantleon HP; Droschl H
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1992 Jun; 53(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 1634161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A new approach in the treatment of skeletal open bite: vertically activated bite block.
    Arat ZM; Sezer FE; Arslan AD
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(4):345-56. PubMed ID: 17190227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Vertical changes following orthodontic extraction treatment in skeletal open bite subjects.
    Aras A
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Aug; 24(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 12198870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Anchorage provided during intra-arch distal molar movement: a comparison between the Nance appliance and a fixed frontal bite plane.
    Bondemark L; Thornéus J
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):437-43. PubMed ID: 15898386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Posterior bite raising effects on a primary anterior crossbite case.
    Miyajima K; Imamura S; Fuwa Y; Nakamura S; Nagahara K; Tsuchiya T; Kurosu K; Iizuka T
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 7577732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Molar and incisor changes with Wilson rapid molar distalization.
    Muse DS; Fillman MJ; Emmerson WJ; Mitchell RD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Dec; 104(6):556-65. PubMed ID: 8249931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.