These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7769792)
1. A labetalol metabolite with analytical characteristics resembling amphetamines. Gilbert RB; Peng PI; Wong D J Anal Toxicol; 1995; 19(2):84-6. PubMed ID: 7769792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Labetalol is metabolized oxidatively in humans. Gal J; Zirrolli JA; Lichtenstein PS Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol; 1988 Oct; 62(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 3205978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of the Syva EMIT and Abbott TDx amphetamine immunoassays to the detection of 3,4-methylene-dioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 3,4-methylene-dioxyethamphetamine (MDEA) in urine. Kunsman GW; Manno JE; Cockerham KR; Manno BR J Anal Toxicol; 1990; 14(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 1973747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stereospecific gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric assay of the chiral labetalol metabolite 3-amino-1-phenylbutane. Changchit A; Gal J; Zirrolli JA Biol Mass Spectrom; 1991 Dec; 20(12):751-8. PubMed ID: 1812984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Elimination of labetalol-induced false positives in drug analyses. Wu A; Bretl DD; Pearson ML; Wolffe GS; Miller ML Clin Chem; 1986 Feb; 32(2):407. PubMed ID: 3510786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of six immunoassays for the detection of amphetamines in urine. Verstraete AG; Heyden FV J Anal Toxicol; 2005; 29(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 16105261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification and quantitation of an oxidative metabolite of labetalol in sheep: pharmacokinetic and metabolic implications. Yeleswaram K; Rurak DW; Kwan E; Hall C; Abbott FS; Axelson JE Biol Mass Spectrom; 1992 Nov; 21(11):534-40. PubMed ID: 1457468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The urinary screening and identification of amphetamines in clinical toxicology laboratory--VGH]. Lin WL; Deng JF; Chou LJ; Hung DZ; Tsai WJ Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1991 Oct; 48(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 1659927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. False-positive amphetamine toxicology screen results in three pregnant women using labetalol. Yee LM; Wu D Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Feb; 117(2 Pt 2):503-506. PubMed ID: 21252805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Designer phenethylamines routinely found in human urine: 2-ethylamino-1-phenylbutane and 2-amino-1-phenylbutane. Uralets V; App M; Rana S; Morgan S; Ross W J Anal Toxicol; 2014 Mar; 38(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 24451085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analytical performance evaluation of EMIT II monoclonal amphetamine/methamphetamine assay: more specificity than EMIT d.a.u. monoclonal amphetamine/methamphetamine assay. Dasgupta A; Saldana S; Kinnaman G; Smith M; Johansen K Clin Chem; 1993 Jan; 39(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 8419030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. False positive amphetamines and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine immunoassays in the presence of metoprolol-two cases reported in clinical toxicology. Leclercq M; Soichot M; Delhotal-Landes B; Bourgogne E; Gourlain H; Mégarbane B; Labat L J Anal Toxicol; 2020 Mar; 44(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 31384953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and evaluation of an improved method for screening of amphetamines. Shindelman J; Mahal J; Hemphill G; Pizzo P; Coty WA J Anal Toxicol; 1999 Oct; 23(6):506-10. PubMed ID: 10517558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine and phenylpropanolamine concentrations in human urine samples and a comparison of the specificity of DRI amphetamines and Abuscreen online (KIMS) amphetamines screening immunoassays. Stout PR; Klette KL; Horn CK J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):160-4. PubMed ID: 14979364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Isomeric amphetamines--a problem for urinalysis? Smith FP; Kidwell DA Forensic Sci Int; 1991 Sep; 50(2):153-65. PubMed ID: 1748353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of three commercial amphetamine immunoassays for detection of methamphetamine, methylenedioxyamphetamine, methylenedioxymethamphetamine, and methylenedioxyethylamphetamine. Ruangyuttikarn W; Moody DE J Anal Toxicol; 1988; 12(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 2903272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of six commercial amphetamine and methamphetamine immunoassays for cross-reactivity to phenylpropanolamine and ephedrine in urine. D'Nicuola J; Jones R; Levine B; Smith ML J Anal Toxicol; 1992; 16(4):211-3. PubMed ID: 1501473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Abuscreen ONLINE assay for amphetamines on the Hitachi 737: comparison with EMIT and GC/MS methods. Baker DP; Murphy MS; Shepp PF; Royo VR; Caldarone ME; Escoto B; Salamone SJ J Forensic Sci; 1995 Jan; 40(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 7876791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]