These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7770319)
1. Using the standard staircase to measure the point of subjective equality: a guide based on computer simulations. Meese TS Percept Psychophys; 1995 Apr; 57(3):267-81. PubMed ID: 7770319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fast and accurate measurement of taste and smell thresholds using a maximum-likelihood adaptive staircase procedure. Linschoten MR; Harvey LO; Eller PM; Jafek BW Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1330-47. PubMed ID: 11800460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Slope bias of psychometric functions derived from adaptive data. Kaernbach C Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1389-98. PubMed ID: 11800464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining thresholds using adaptive procedures and psychometric fits: evaluating efficiency using theory, simulations, and human experiments. Karmali F; Chaudhuri SE; Yi Y; Merfeld DM Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):773-89. PubMed ID: 26645306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Wichmann FA; Hill NJ Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1293-313. PubMed ID: 11800458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Invariance of the psychometric function for character recognition across the visual field. Strasburger H Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1356-76. PubMed ID: 11800462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The step method: a new adaptive psychophysical procedure. Simpson WA Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jun; 45(6):572-6. PubMed ID: 2740198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Confidence intervals for the parameters of psychometric functions. Maloney LT Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 2304811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary. Klein SA Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1421-55. PubMed ID: 11800466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [DIN-compatible vision assessment of increased reproducibility using staircase measurement and maximum likelihood analysis]. Weigmann U; Petersen J Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 8963126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Signal detection theory and vestibular perception: III. Estimating unbiased fit parameters for psychometric functions. Chaudhuri SE; Merfeld DM Exp Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 225(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 23250442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the analysis of psychometric functions: the Spearman-Kärber method. Miller J; Ulrich R Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1399-420. PubMed ID: 11800465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tracking of nociceptive thresholds using adaptive psychophysical methods. Doll RJ; Buitenweg JR; Meijer HG; Veltink PH Behav Res Methods; 2014 Mar; 46(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 23835651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A computer program for Spearman-Kärber and probit analysis of psychometric function data. Miller J; Ulrich R Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Feb; 36(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 15190695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying steep psychometric function slope quickly in clinical applications. Turpin A; Jankovic D; McKendrick A Vision Res; 2010 Nov; 50(23):2476-85. PubMed ID: 20801144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recovering stimuli from memory: a statistical method for linking discrimination and reproduction responses. Vevea JL Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):321-46. PubMed ID: 17067415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance metrics for an application-driven selection and optimization of psychophysical sampling procedures. Rinderknecht MD; Lambercy O; Gassert R PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207217. PubMed ID: 30485350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]