These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 777041)
21. Microstix and other office tests for detection of urinary tract infection. Med Lett Drugs Ther; 1974 Feb; 16(3):13-5. PubMed ID: 4588284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of the DipStreak, a new device with an original streaking mechanism for detection, counting, and presumptive identification of urinary tract pathogens. Scarparo C; Piccoli P; Ricordi P; Scagnelli M J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Jun; 40(6):2169-75. PubMed ID: 12037082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Risk of overdiagnosis of urine cultures]. Pettersson L; Kinnunen K; Forsum U Lakartidningen; 1995 May; 92(21):2195-6. PubMed ID: 7776755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Detection of bacteriuria by dip-slide. Routine use in a large general hospital. Ellner PD; Papachristos T Am J Clin Pathol; 1975 Apr; 63(4):516-21. PubMed ID: 1091136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Microbiologic evaluation of canine urine: direct microscopic examination and preservation of specimen quality for culture. Allen TA; Jones RL; Purvance J J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1987 May; 190(10):1289-91. PubMed ID: 3294768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The diagnostic accuracy of the rapid dipstick test to predict asymptomatic urinary tract infection of pregnancy. Eigbefoh JO; Isabu P; Okpere E; Abebe J J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jul; 28(5):490-5. PubMed ID: 18850421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the Cult-Dip Plus dip slide method for urinary tract infection. Blondeau JM; Yaschuk Y; Galenzoski D; Hrabok D; Isaacson M; Lee L; Link H; Walshaw L J Clin Pathol; 1995 Aug; 48(8):710-3. PubMed ID: 7560194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Diagnosis of urinary tract infections in puerperium]. Gerber B; Schmidt H; Ohde A Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Sep; 54(9):524-8. PubMed ID: 7988857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Utility of urine reagent strip in screening women with incontinence for urinary tract infection. Buchsbaum GM; Albushies DT; Guzick DS Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2004; 15(6):391-3; discussion 393. PubMed ID: 15278254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison between microscopical examination of unstained deposits of urine and quantitative culture. Littlewood JM; Jacobs SI; Ramsden CH Arch Dis Child; 1977 Nov; 52(11):894-6. PubMed ID: 339849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimal diagnostic testing for urinary tract infection in young children. Novak R; Powell K; Christopher N Pediatr Dev Pathol; 2004; 7(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 15022064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Can routine automated urinalysis reduce culture requests? Kayalp D; Dogan K; Ceylan G; Senes M; Yucel D Clin Biochem; 2013 Sep; 46(13-14):1285-9. PubMed ID: 23810583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Technically simple method for urine microbe count]. Stille W; Helm E Med Welt; 1970 Sep; 37():1626-8. PubMed ID: 4945542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of a new system (Compactdry SCD) with conventional methods for quantitative urine cultures. Horii T; Morita M; Kameno Y; Kanno T; Maekawa M Lett Appl Microbiol; 2002; 35(6):499-503. PubMed ID: 12460432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An evaluation of the gram stain and chocolate agar culture as part of a routine urine culture set-up. Boyd DE; Flournoy DJ; Hussain Qadri SM Med Microbiol Immunol; 1980; 169(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 6162084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical laboratory evaluation of automated microbial detection/identification system in analysis of clinical urine specimens. Isenberg HD; Gavan TL; Sonnenwirth A; Taylor WI; Washington JA J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 10(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 389950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]