These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7771369)

  • 1. A computer assisted photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment. Part I: Methodology and reliability.
    Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Jorgensen GJ; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jun; 107(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 7771369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A computer assisted photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment. Part II: Results.
    Cummins DM; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jul; 108(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 7598103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment.
    Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Zaher AR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jan; 111(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 9009919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions.
    Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Jakobsen JR; Zaher AR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 7817959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusions: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Feb; 107(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 7847270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction Class II Division 1 malocclusions.
    Zierhut EC; Joondeph DR; Artun J; Little RM
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Jun; 70(3):208-19. PubMed ID: 10926430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Posttreatment changes in male and female patients: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ortho D; Jakobsen JR; Angelakis D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Dec; 110(6):624-9. PubMed ID: 8972809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in facial dimensions assessed from lateral and frontal photographs. Part I--Methodology.
    Bishara SE; Jorgensen GJ; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Oct; 108(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 7572850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment in Japanese-Brazilians with class I and class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Hayasaki SM; Castanha Henriques JF; Janson G; de Freitas MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 15643412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional assessment of the effects of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment on the face.
    Ismail SF; Moss JP; Hennessy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Mar; 121(3):244-56. PubMed ID: 11941338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of two VTO methods.
    Sample LB; Sadowsky PL; Bradley E
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 9770097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Therapeutic changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
    Saelens NA; De Smit AA
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 9699401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Morphospatial analysis of soft-tissue profile in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated using twin block appliances: geometric morphometrics.
    Singh GD
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2002 Feb; 5(1):38-50. PubMed ID: 12071373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft-tissue treatment changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion with and without extraction of maxillary premolars.
    Janson G; Fuziy A; de Freitas MR; Castanha Henriques JF; de Almeida RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):729.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18068588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected?
    Gkantidis N; Halazonetis DJ; Alexandropoulos E; Haralabakis NB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 21889079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of facial profiles in extraction and nonextraction treatment.
    James RD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Sep; 114(3):265-76. PubMed ID: 9743131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A cephalometric evaluation of nonextraction cervical headgear treatment in Class II malocclusions.
    Hubbard GW; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 7802330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Profile changes in patients treated with and without extractions: assessments by lay people.
    Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):639-44. PubMed ID: 9423696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.